| What really surprized me from that page was the sound from the guitar
synthesis developed here:
http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/demos/dafx2000-synth/
I had never heard such an accurate guitar modeling... An it surprized
me it was actually in 2000.... Does anyone know what that project led
to?
Cheers,
Andrés
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Peiman Khosravi
wrote:
> Yes OM does it. I've also done this:
>
> export partial tracks from SPEAR in txt format and import them in PWGL.
> After that it's easy to convert the data to midi.
>
> http://www2.siba.fi/pwgl/
>
> Many of the openmusic libraries have been ported to PWGL.
>
> Best
>
> Peiman
>
> On 10 Dec 2009, at 14:13, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>
>> I thought things like OpenMusic did something of the kind. There must be
>> something like this around. Otherwise it is a good tool to be developed.
>> On 10 Dec 2009, at 13:09, DavidW wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 10/12/2009, at 11:01 PM, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>>>
>>>> Because, I guess this is quite a hard thing to do. One thing is the FFT,
>>>> the other is how we perceive sound and a third one is how things are
>>>> notated. Not a straight one-to-one mapping, I'm afraid. Like polyphonic
>>>> pitch-tracking and instrument segregation, these are very hard things. Also
>>>> for us: consider how many years of training it takes to transcribe down a
>>>> 4-part Bach chorale from a recording. I also have the impression that each
>>>> one of us hears the combination of tones/instrument/timbre in a complex mix
>>>> slightly differently and objects do not all get segregated in the same way
>>>> in each of our heads. I might be wrong of course.
>>>>
>>> I understand that what you describe is complex. But it wasn't what I was
>>> asking. I don't want the software to make its decisions for me. I want
>>> algorithmic access to the parameter space so I can determine, say how many
>>> partials to render to as chords in the m/s, how many different dynamic
>>> levels etc.
>>>
>>> Also, I'm not sure the Bach chorale eg is a good one. How many years of
>>> training would it take to one calculate 1 million decimal places of pi. And
>>> how many seconds for a computer?
>>>>
>>>> Last week, I heard of a mobile phone applet that can tell you what a
>>>> piece of music is if it is played to it. Not having a mobile phone myself, I
>>>> can't say it's true or otherwise. That seems to me to at least partially
>>>> negate what I have just said above, so it just shows how much I know about
>>>> these things... ;)
>>>>
>>> me too.
>>>>
>>>> Victor
>>>>
>>>> On 10 Dec 2009, at 10:39, DavidW wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can't quiet believe, for example, that there isn't a public domain
>>>>> API solution to the task of FFT to score notation with the filter parameters
>>>>> under algorithmic control. Or there is and I've missed it perhaps? Even a
>>>>> half-decent FFT to MIDI would fill a gap.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
>>>> csound"
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________
>>> Dr David Worrall.
>>> - Experimental Polymedia: worrall.avatar.com.au
>>> - Sonification: www.sonifiction.com.au
>>> - Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
>>> csound"
>>
>>
>>
>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
>> csound"
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
>
--
Andrés
Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |