[Csnd] pvstencil question
| Date | 2009-12-01 19:56 |
| From | Peiman Khosravi |
| Subject | [Csnd] pvstencil question |
| Hello, For some reason when the level variable of pvstencil is set to one not much is happening. I need to increase this to at least 3 or 4 to get any significant results. Is this because I am using pvsftw to write the noise print to table? According to the manual skipping post normalization (setting this to one) should be a good place to start. fsig pvstencil fsigin, kgain, klevel, iftable Thanks in advance. Best, Peiman fsig1 pvsanal ain1, ifftsize, ihop, iwindow, p7 fsig2 pvsanal ain2, ifftsize, ihop, iwindow, p7 fsrc1 pvsblur fsig1, 0.5, 0.5 fsrc2 pvsblur fsig2, 0.5, 0.5 fsigfr1 pvsfreeze fsrc1, kfreez, kfreez fsigfr2 pvsfreeze fsrc2, kfreez, kfreez if (kfreez>0) then kflag1 pvsftw fsigfr1, giftable1 kflag2 pvsftw fsigfr2, giftable2 endif fout1 pvstencil fsig1, kgain, klevel, giftable1 fout2 pvstencil fsig2, kgain, klevel, giftable2 |
| Date | 2009-12-01 21:32 |
| From | victor |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: pvstencil question |
|
yes, basically this depends on the level of the
amps on the table, so klevel is really there to be used. With GEN43, the usual
application of pvstencil, if we skip post-normalisation, the level does not
normally need to be touched. The main point here is that if the table is very
low-level throughout, no stenciling happens, because signal levels will not
normally fall below the table level.
Victor
|
| Date | 2009-12-01 21:48 |
| From | Peiman Khosravi |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: pvstencil question |
| Thanks Victor. That answers my question. Just wanted to make sure I am not doing something wrong. Best, Peiman On 1 Dec 2009, at 21:32, victor wrote:
|