[Csnd] Compress Opcode and 0dbfs

Date	2013-10-21 12:29
From	cameron bobro
Subject	[Csnd] Compress Opcode and 0dbfs
	In 5.x the compress opcode does not work with 0dbfs = 0. Otherwise it works brilliantly- at 64 bits and 192k it is what a clear compressor should be. Has this quirk been fixed in 6x? thank you for your precious time

Date	2013-10-21 12:33
From	cameron bobro
Subject	[Csnd] Re: Compress Opcode and 0dbfs
	I mean of course 0dbfs = 1, of course On Monday, October 21, 2013 1:29 PM, cameron bobro <misterbobro@yahoo.com> wrote: In 5.x the compress opcode does not work with 0dbfs = 0. Otherwise it works brilliantly- at 64 bits and 192k it is what a clear compressor should be. Has this quirk been fixed in 6x? thank you for your precious time

Date	2013-10-21 13:22
From	Victor Lazzarini
Subject	Re: [Csnd] Re: Compress Opcode and 0dbfs
	I don't hear any difference between 0dbfs=1 and 0dbfs=32768 in the manual example with csound 6. On 21 Oct 2013, at 12:33, cameron bobro wrote: > I mean of course 0dbfs = 1, of course > > > > On Monday, October 21, 2013 1:29 PM, cameron bobro wrote: > In 5.x the compress opcode does not work with 0dbfs = 0. > > Otherwise it works brilliantly- at 64 bits and 192k it is what a clear compressor should be. > > Has this quirk been fixed in 6x? > > thank you for your precious time > > Dr Victor Lazzarini Senior Lecturer Dept. of Music NUI Maynooth Ireland tel.: +353 1 708 3545 Victor dot Lazzarini AT nuim dot ie