| haha, no, It was not a bet ;-)
The only discussion was inside my own head.
Thanks for the help
Oeyvind
2013/10/10 Rory Walsh :
> I hope you didn't put money on it being a first order filter Oeyvind ;)
>
>
> On 10 October 2013 09:03, Richard Dobson wrote:
>> Yes, second-order.
>>
>> Richard Dobson
>>
>>
>> On 10/10/2013 08:43, Oeyvind Brandtsegg wrote:
>>>
>>> Just a minor terminology issue that I'd like to settle, and what
>>> better place to ask than here?
>>>
>>> A simple digital bandpass filter can be written
>>> x(n) = (x(n) - x(n-2)) / 2
>>> Now, would you call this a first order or second order filter?
>>> My hunch is that it is first order, but I wonder if it is technically
>>> more correct to call it a second order filter? Looking at
>>> http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/~jos/filters/Filter_Order.html
>>> "The maximum delay, in samples, used in creating each output sample is
>>> called the order of the filter."
>>>
>>> best
>>> Oeyvind
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug trackers
>> csound6:
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/tickets/
>> csound5:
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/bugs/
>> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
>> csound"
>>
>>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug trackers
> csound6:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/tickets/
> csound5:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/bugs/
> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
>
>
--
Oeyvind Brandtsegg
Professor of Music Technology
NTNU
7491 Trondheim
Norway
Cell: +47 92 203 205
http://flyndresang.no/
http://www.partikkelaudio.com/
http://soundcloud.com/brandtsegg
http://soundcloud.com/t-emp
|