csoundQT shortcuts [was Re: [Csnd] csoundapi and csound~]

Date	2013-10-02 08:11
From	peiman khosravi
Subject	csoundQT shortcuts [was Re: [Csnd] csoundapi and csound~]
	Hi Andres, So far it's been really stable. Interestingly I'm on 10.7.5. Some of the examples still don't work and I have one issue. The shortcuts with the 'alt' key (to stop performance for instance) seem to also require the 'fn' key. So I have to hold down alt+fn and then press S to stop. Is this normal? Thanks Peiman www.peimankhosravi.co.uk \|\| RSS Feed \|\| Concert News On 1 October 2013 21:36, Andres Cabrera <mantaraya36@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Peiman, Good to hear. There were some reentrancy issues with the MIDI modules, which have been solved with the latest Csound6. Maybe the fact that everything was now built using 10.8 made the difference. Cheers, Andrés On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:50 AM, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi@gmail.com> wrote: I've just downloaded the nightly build of qt and it seems to be running fine so far! P www.peimankhosravi.co.uk \|\| RSS Feed \|\| Concert News On 1 October 2013 13:40, Richard Dobson <richarddobson@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: It is true that the SDK is under NDA, so that only registered developers can create plugins. Probably only a closed-source wrapper system like Cycling74's sadly discontinued Jitter system would be viable. The SDK for AAX does look somewhat better than the RTAS one ever was (based on the old MacOS ported very crudely to OS X), and while such things will never be simple, I think it does look more attractive to develop for. Not being a Pro Tools user as such, I have no immediate reason to mourn the loss of RTAS! Pat of the problem with developing PT plugins is that they need a minimum level of support to be included for all the various external hardware control surfaces, including third-party ones. In a few cases they have provided simulators as part of the SDK (using one computer networked to the development machine), but one way and another it is a rather expensive business, which I guess is why PT plugins are themselves "cheap" at a whole new order of magnitude. Richard Dobson On 01/10/2013 12:06, Rory Walsh wrote: Fair point. Vienna library looks like a nice solution, but not worth the money if it's for just one application. I thought that you just might have a license for it there already. It's a pity Avid have locked all plugins to AAX in the latest version of Protools. I doubt there is much chance of them providing me with a license which enables people to develop high end plugins for free. Seems kind of anti-avid. I also heard that developers of previous VST to RTAS plugins had awful times dealing with Avid. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug trackers csound6: https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/tickets/ csound5: https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/bugs/ Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"

Date	2013-10-03 20:19
From	Andres Cabrera
Subject	Re: csoundQT shortcuts [was Re: [Csnd] csoundapi and csound~]
	Hi Peiman, That is weird, I haven't seen that... You can always change your shortcuts from the menu option. Cheers, Andrés On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:11 AM, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Andres, So far it's been really stable. Interestingly I'm on 10.7.5. Some of the examples still don't work and I have one issue. The shortcuts with the 'alt' key (to stop performance for instance) seem to also require the 'fn' key. So I have to hold down alt+fn and then press S to stop. Is this normal? Thanks Peiman www.peimankhosravi.co.uk \|\| RSS Feed \|\| Concert News On 1 October 2013 21:36, Andres Cabrera <mantaraya36@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Peiman, Good to hear. There were some reentrancy issues with the MIDI modules, which have been solved with the latest Csound6. Maybe the fact that everything was now built using 10.8 made the difference. Cheers, Andrés On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:50 AM, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi@gmail.com> wrote: I've just downloaded the nightly build of qt and it seems to be running fine so far! P www.peimankhosravi.co.uk \|\| RSS Feed \|\| Concert News On 1 October 2013 13:40, Richard Dobson <richarddobson@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: It is true that the SDK is under NDA, so that only registered developers can create plugins. Probably only a closed-source wrapper system like Cycling74's sadly discontinued Jitter system would be viable. The SDK for AAX does look somewhat better than the RTAS one ever was (based on the old MacOS ported very crudely to OS X), and while such things will never be simple, I think it does look more attractive to develop for. Not being a Pro Tools user as such, I have no immediate reason to mourn the loss of RTAS! Pat of the problem with developing PT plugins is that they need a minimum level of support to be included for all the various external hardware control surfaces, including third-party ones. In a few cases they have provided simulators as part of the SDK (using one computer networked to the development machine), but one way and another it is a rather expensive business, which I guess is why PT plugins are themselves "cheap" at a whole new order of magnitude. Richard Dobson On 01/10/2013 12:06, Rory Walsh wrote: Fair point. Vienna library looks like a nice solution, but not worth the money if it's for just one application. I thought that you just might have a license for it there already. It's a pity Avid have locked all plugins to AAX in the latest version of Protools. I doubt there is much chance of them providing me with a license which enables people to develop high end plugins for free. Seems kind of anti-avid. I also heard that developers of previous VST to RTAS plugins had awful times dealing with Avid. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug trackers csound6: https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/tickets/ csound5: https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/bugs/ Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"