Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[Csnd] /=

Date2014-06-28 08:07
FromEnrico Francioni
Subject[Csnd] /=
hello to all, 

which command corresponds to /= in csound6? 

thanks, 
enrico



--
View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/-tp5736047.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Date2014-06-28 16:45
FromHlöðver Sigurðsson
SubjectRe: [Csnd] /=
I thought it all worked

+=
-=
*=
/=

Should be easy programming to add this division feature.


2014-06-28 7:07 GMT+00:00 Enrico Francioni <francioni61021@libero.it>:
hello to all,

which command corresponds to /= in csound6?

thanks,
enrico



--
View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/-tp5736047.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Send bugs reports to
        https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"





Date2014-06-28 17:18
Fromjpff@cs.bath.ac.uk
Subject[Csnd] Re:
AttachmentsNone  

Date2014-06-29 07:15
FromKelly Hirai
SubjectRe: [Csnd] Re:
perhaps he's speaking ada and is looking for != (not equal).
kelly

On 06/28/2014 12:18 PM, jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk wrote:
> As far as I am aware /= exists in csound6 and has for some time.
> If it does not work let me know with an example
>
> Or have I misunderstood the question again?
>
> x /= y  is equivalent to x = x/y
> =John ff
>
> Quoting Enrico Francioni :
>
>> hello to all,
>>
>> which command corresponds to /= in csound6?
>>
>> thanks,
>> enrico
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/-tp5736047.html
>> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> Send bugs reports to
>>         https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
>> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body
>> "unsubscribe csound"
>
>
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to
>        https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body
> "unsubscribe csound"
>
>
>


Date2014-06-29 07:29
FromEnrico Francioni
Subject[Csnd] Re: Re:
Thank you 
John!

e



--
View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/-tp5736047p5736065.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Date2014-06-29 23:06
FromPablo Frank
Subject[Csnd] from pulse to sound with table3 - not smooth: limitation or bug
The bridge between pulse and sound should be listened smooth with table3 because of the interpolation, but it sounds rough. Is it a bug or a limitation? the .csd below



<CsoundSynthesizer>

<CsOptions>

-o a.wav

</CsOptions>

<CsInstruments>


sr = 22050

kr = 22050

ksmps =1

nchnls = 1

0dbfs = 1



instr 1


klinseg expseg 1,p3*.5,240,p3*.5,240


andx phasor klinseg

asig table3 andx, 2, 1


out asig


endin




</CsInstruments>

<CsScore>


f2 0 1025 7 1 1 0 1024 0

i1 0 10

e

</CsScore>

</CsoundSynthesizer>





Date2014-06-30 05:19
FromKelly Hirai
SubjectRe: [Csnd] from pulse to sound with table3 - not smooth: limitation
as the number of samples in the reproduced cycle decreases past the number of samples in the table, the chances of phasor indexing the first sample of the table (andx==0) dimishes.

k. 
On 06/29/2014 06:06 PM, Pablo Frank wrote:
The bridge between pulse and sound should be listened smooth with table3 because of the interpolation, but it sounds rough. Is it a bug or a limitation? the .csd below



<CsoundSynthesizer>

<CsOptions>

-o a.wav

</CsOptions>

<CsInstruments>


sr = 22050

kr = 22050

ksmps =1

nchnls = 1

0dbfs = 1



instr 1


klinseg expseg 1,p3*.5,240,p3*.5,240


andx phasor klinseg

asig table3 andx, 2, 1


out asig


endin




</CsInstruments>

<CsScore>


f2 0 1025 7 1 1 0 1024 0

i1 0 10

e

</CsScore>

</CsoundSynthesizer>