| Thanks for the feedback, Bruce!
- Dave
Bruce H. McCosar wrote:
> --- Dave Seidel wrote:
>> My first though is to start by rendering the pieces to
>> 44.1K/16, since
>> that's the "native" format does CDs. (Normally I render to
>> 96/24.) But
>> I am open to any and all advice from people who have already
>> been down
>> this road.
>
> Greetings, Dave. I've just completed my 4th album on Jamendo,
> and I come from the opposite direction. I started off in analog
> mixing, then moved to digital, and now have embraced synth
> sounds and microtonal music.
>
> "Mastering" is a debatable term. To many people, the process is
> more or less like a religion. Some folks think of mastering as
> the following:
>
> 1. Rendering each of your (separate) tracks to maximum
> resolution and clarity, then storing them on high resolution
> media.
>
> 2. Mixing down all the separate tracks to one big, final track,
> taking care to fill in the sonic space as best as possible (eg
> equalization to bring out an instrument that otherwise would be
> lost in the mix, or to reduce the 'mud')
>
> 3. Finally, the most debatable portion, to participate in the
> "loudness war" and hypercompress then entire track so that the
> peak amplitudes hover near the 0dBfs line the entire track.
>
> (There's an excellent overview here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war
>
> as well as a sort of editorial here:
>
> http://www.jamendo.com/en/album/19656
>
> from the standpoint of someone who has chosen not to play
> along.)
>
> For myself, I compress the loud parts of the song to be as
> powerful and surging as they can be, but take care to leave
> dynamic space, quiet times, as well.
>
> Now, mastering with Csound, there is the option of just
> rendering the entire track to the final stage and going on with
> your business. But then, how do you evaluate whether a tiny bit
> of equalization in a minor instrument would make the entire
> composition brighter, or whether a falloff on the bass response
> on one instrument would allow the others to go higher without
> clipping?
>
> My guess is the following: render a few sections of your
> composition as separate high resolution tracks, then play around
> with them in a live mixer. When you find a happy spot, write
> down your settings, and hard code them into a second Csound
> file, your "production model". That way, if you have a problem
> later, you can always go back to the original and either run
> with it or start over. Csound's on-board EQ's and mixing tools
> are total science fiction superweapons compared to most
> commercial offerings. Plus, no noise, no cable hum, no
> impedence mismatch. You work with pure sound, and that's the
> addictive part.
>
> Good luck, and hope this helped a bit.
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
>
>
|