[Csnd] Re: Realtime render to both DAC and disk?
Date | 2008-04-02 09:12 |
From | victor |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Realtime render to both DAC and disk? |
use fout instead of soundout. Victor ----- Original Message ----- From: "micromoog" |
Date | 2008-04-02 09:37 |
From | "Oeyvind Brandtsegg" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Realtime render to both DAC and disk? |
Attachments | None |
Date | 2008-04-02 15:13 |
From | "Andres Cabrera" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Realtime render to both DAC and disk? |
Attachments | None |
Date | 2008-04-03 12:28 |
From | "Oeyvind Brandtsegg" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Realtime render to both DAC and disk? |
Attachments | None |
Date | 2008-04-03 13:35 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Realtime render to both DAC and disk? |
hummmm.... can you add some of these examples to the manual - and a monitor example. showing how to do this is very important and useful - and not exactly intuitive or clear - yet. wishing you all the best. -dB On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Andres Cabrera wrote: > you can also use monitor to record the exact audio output, without > having to worry about sending everything to the channels. > > http://www.csounds.com/manual/html/monitor.html > > Cheers, > Andrès > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Oeyvind Brandtsegg > |
Date | 2008-04-03 17:03 |
From | Panos Katergiathis |
Subject | [Csnd] Benchmarking Csound Performance |
Hello all Since i am trying to migrate from Windows to Linux, i have tried several hardware combinations in order to build a good and stable system - also, one that will be able to handle my csound attempts. I don't have enough csound compositions of my own, so every time i set up a system like that,i download Steven Yi's csd files (from his site) and test my csound installations by running them and hearing the results. Why? Because some of them seem to be more demanding in terms of processing power (for realtime rendering to dac), so i am thinking that if "distant stars" renders fine, then the system is adequate for my current needs. This afternoon, i thought that some sort of official benchmarking should exist, so that one could perform a series of tests and determine the adequacy of any given system. This may not be very important to Windows users (with all the asio stuff), but in the world of Linux, where low latency audio (or firewire audio, for that matter) is a bit elusive, one needs a system for evaluating such things. Any thoughts? Panos |
Date | 2008-04-03 17:59 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Benchmarking Csound Performance |
Panos, I think the stock kernel these days is quite good, but you can get the patched RT kernels off planetccrma, which are nice and reliable. I use my own kernel builds, but you might not want to do that ;)... So my suggestion is to start off with the planetccrma distribution, which is fedora based (I think). I am very happy with fedora, never gave me trouble (been using it since, I don't know, red hat linux 4?). Other people find it not as easy as Ubuntu, but I don't like the fact that Ubuntu makes you download everything you need after you installed (it only comes with the bare minimum). Victor At 17:03 03/04/2008, you wrote: >Hello all > >Since i am trying to migrate from Windows to Linux, i have tried several >hardware combinations in order to build a good and stable system - also, >one that will be able to handle my csound attempts. > >I don't have enough csound compositions of my own, so every time i set up >a system like that,i download Steven Yi's csd files (from his site) and >test my csound installations by running them and hearing the results. > >Why? Because some of them seem to be more demanding in terms of processing >power (for realtime rendering to dac), so i am thinking that if "distant >stars" renders fine, then the system is adequate for my current needs. > >This afternoon, i thought that some sort of official benchmarking should >exist, so that one could perform a series of tests and determine the >adequacy of any given system. This may not be very important to Windows >users (with all the asio stuff), but in the world of Linux, where low >latency audio (or firewire audio, for that matter) is a bit elusive, one >needs a system for evaluating such things. > >Any thoughts? > >Panos > > >Send bugs reports to this list. >To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe >csound" Victor Lazzarini Music Technology Laboratory Music Department National University of Ireland, Maynooth |