> John, I did some extensive testing with the PhISEM opcodes last night.
> My csound version was built from the dev branch on Aug 16th, and
> appears to have the fixes for a few other bugs I had tested/reported
> (ftgenonce, pset, flooper2).  I'm not sure if your changes to phisem
> opcodes were included in this build or not, but I still figured my
> findings could be useful.

> I still see a lot of unexpected behavior with the phisem opcodes.
> Some of these might be intended behavior, but I don't think so.  If
> anything I reported here is working as intended, please let me know so
> I can change my instruments and tests.  I tried to to test all
> parameters on all phisem opcodes that I could find listed in the
> manual and document it as best as I could.

sorry not to respond earlier but I was engaged elsewhere.  Just
getting back to your report -- which is daunting....

Would you be so kind as to send me your test csd files?  It would give
be a head start in attacking them, and would be a great hep to me.
Kindly send offlist to this address, or at least a selection so I can
get back to this code, as it is 14 years since I looked closely.

> Opcodes tested: bamboo, cabasa, crunch, dripwater, guiro, sandpaper,
> sekere, sleighbells, stix, tambourine.  Let me know if I missed any.

that is complete

What does "values off by scale of 32768:" mean?

I will start with the example you sent (guiro)

==John ffitch

John, no sweat on the delay, I understand we're all busy!

I'd be glad to send over my test.  I do most of my testing in Steven's
"Blue", because I just love the flexibility of the IDE, but would you
prefer it if I strip it down to a bare csd for simplicity?  I don't
mind either way, whatever will be best for you to troubleshoot with.

When I say off by a scale of 32768, I mean the "expected" value of 0-1
seems to explode the output, but if you divide it by 32768 you will
get a usable result.  This was only tested with 0dbfs=1, so the
results may be different when working without it.

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:21 PM,   wrote:
>
> PS I think I have found the cause of the once change of parameters in guiro.
> At least the change I have made seems an improvement.  Tried the same in
> bamboo and there as no change....humm
>
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to
>        https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
>
>
>