[Csnd] Re: plain text was midiamplitude, ifmindex

Date	2010-05-26 00:38
From	Jim Stevenson
Subject	[Csnd] Re: plain text was midiamplitude, ifmindex
	Hi. Is the attached html really of any use to those who read with speech? -- Please answer in plain text, not mime attached html. Thanks much again as always. Jim Please forgive if you really want to attach html and are using its features. Do you know that you are posting in mime attached duplicate html? Can you please explain why the mime attached html? If so, may I please ask which mail program is creating these html attachments, under which OS, and why? I am absolutely certain that it is not my mail program, or anything on my end, though your mail program may hide them from you. This is why others may not have pointed out the mime attached html problem. Your mime attached html post, which I have appended, is exactly what I received. Are you using html to display anything other than plain text? Unless you really are using the html features, the defaults should be set to both post and answer in plain text, or uuencode, if plain text is not an option. your answer mode should also be set to answer in plain text, or answer in uuencode, not to answer in kind. I am most concerned about viruses in unintended attachments. If you must quote me, please put your comments first. I have already listened to mine. I read email with speech, So it is not possible to scroll past the html and quotes without listening to them again, and the mime code after the header is not speech friendly. to quickly get to the new information. The mime attached html is far from speech friendly! -- Thanks much again as always. >From csound-owner@lists.bath.ac.uk Mon May 24 01:42:19 2010 Return-Path: Received: from pagent1.arc.nasa.gov (pagent1.arc.nasa.gov [128.102.31.161]) by eos.arc.nasa.gov (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4O8gJrN004244 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 01:42:19 -0700 Received: from prost.bath.ac.uk (prost.bath.ac.uk [138.38.0.37]) by pagent1.arc.nasa.gov (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4O8gGW5022774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 01:42:18 -0700 Received: from hammerhead.bath.ac.uk ([138.38.32.43]) by prost.bath.ac.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4) (envelope-from ) id 1OGTEl-0006VH-Ck; Mon, 24 May 2010 09:42:16 +0100 Received: from sympa by hammerhead.bath.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1OGTEl-0005TN-Cr; Mon, 24 May 2010 09:42:15 +0100 Received: from prost.bath.ac.uk ([138.38.0.37]) by hammerhead.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1OGTES-0005Rf-DK for csound@lists.bath.ac.uk; Mon, 24 May 2010 09:41:56 +0100 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]) by prost.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4) (envelope-from ) id 1OGTER-0006T1-A8 for csound@lists.bath.ac.uk; Mon, 24 May 2010 09:41:55 +0100 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1460372fgg.12 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 01:41:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bcnnxBgBgqsZWuIxgd/zLQ2X9A47tnR8Zsnd4lzqWUs=; b=Du1Hck+VtNFKWvFQeMafM5xQ+6khwD+wdT+xutf2k+Y7JyxdEAzndin/NmrJXJ0qCb QfUnHJ9JRvVoIEBERCaYX8+h1M/FTDwy8jg8/Rrnit3jQqhklyD2/aW67aSJMMoIjlUQ WXBwEksdk9gS2ENmwxpChymYAyT+EHUYk1W1k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZiEr5/Q02S9whpe0nw9PF4zpWrWPT/OAwCiD5qynB6J+M8zuHZVWCko9R7i4xciS0v 6Kp0p3BKAku4JT5FUtoTYjUgk+e+86wMCYzHxDwHmZPicb/W6l49/ggavor2D3LitBPv xhm5IyCK/cNQI+Pk7js8I0/dmx/gaPoLdCLq0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.162.136 with SMTP id l8mr445419hbd.212.1274690499297; Mon, 24 May 2010 01:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.180.20 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 01:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:41:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: Stefan Thomas To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636457cc268c21004875302b0 X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: 0.4/6.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results * 0.4 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message ---- End SpamAssassin results Subject: [Csnd] midiamplitude, ifmindex Reply-To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk X-Loop: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk X-Sequence: 14100 Errors-to: csound-owner@lists.bath.ac.uk Precedence: list X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: X-Scanner: 9adcc335c81e7673e85b89af3215302f22088927 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2010-05-24_01:2010-02-06,2010-05-24,2010-05-23 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1005240015 X-Proofpoint-Bar: Status: RO --001636457cc268c21004875302b0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear community, I tried to constuct a connection between midi-velocity and ifm index in the following file. I think, I suceeded in that way, that now a higher midi-velocity value corresponds to a higher ifm-index. I used tablei and gen17 for this, is this the right way? And there is one ohther thing, wich confuses me: I have the feeling, that I can't really hear a difference in terms of loudness. It seems, that there is no really difference between pianissimo and fortissimo. Do I hear wrong or is something wrong with the code? Here is my example: sr = 48000 kr = 480 ksmps = 100 nchnls = 2 massign 1, 101 instr 101 icps cpsmidi iamp ampmidi 10000 iwave = 1 icar = 2 imod = 1 ifn = 2 ixmode = 0 imidiv veloc indx = imidiv ifmindex tablei indx, ifn, ixmode ;ifmindex = 4 asig foscil iamp, icps, icar, imod, ifmindex, iwave outs asig, asig endin f0 3600 f1 0 8193 10 1 ;sinus f 2 0 1025 -17 0 0 1 1 127 8 ; for imidivel =1 get ifmindex =1, for imidivel = 127 get ifmindex = 16 i101 0 3600 Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" --001636457cc268c21004875302b0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear community, I tried to constuct a connection between midi-velocity a= nd ifm index in the following file. I think, I suceeded in that way, tha= t now a higher midi-velocity value corresponds to a higher ifm-index. = =0A= I used tablei and gen17 for this, is this the right way? And there is on= e ohther thing, wich confuses me: I have the feeling, that I can't r= eally hear a difference in terms of loudness. It seems, that there is no re= ally difference between pianissimo and fortissimo. =0A= Do I hear wrong or is something wrong with the code? Here is my example:= <CsoundSynthesizer> <CsOptions> </CsOptions><CsInstruments> sr=A0=A0=A0=A0 =3D 48000 kr=A0=A0=A0=A0 =3D 48= 0 ksmps=A0 =3D 100 =0A= nchnls =3D 2 massign 1, 101 instr 101 icps cpsmidi =A0 iamp= =A0=A0=A0 ampmidi=A0=A0=A0=A0 10000 iwave =3D 1 icar =3D 2 imod = =3D 1 ifn =3D 2 ixmode =3D 0 imidiv veloc indx =3D imidiv if= mindex=A0 tablei indx, ifn, ixmode =0A= ;ifmindex =3D 4 asig foscil iamp, icps, icar, imod, ifmindex, iwave = =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 outs=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 asig, asig =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 endin =A0 </CsInstruments> <CsScore> f0 3600 f1=A0 0=A0= =A0 8193=A0 10=A0=A0 1 ;sinus f 2 0 1025 -17 0 0=A0 1 1 127 8 ; for imid= ivel =3D1 get ifmindex =3D1, for imidivel =3D 127 get ifmindex =3D 16 = =0A= i101=A0=A0 0=A0=A0=A0 3600 </CsScore> </CsoundSynthesize= r> =0A= --001636457cc268c21004875302b0-- Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"