[Csnd] someone has to ask...
Date | 2012-10-18 21:19 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
I'm just going to put it out there, and as the movie goes, if you don't like you can send it back. How is it that the word 'velocity', which I learned in school to be speed in a given direction, is the word used to describe the amplitude of MIDI notes? |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:21 |
From | Adam Puckett |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
veloc = speed your finger hits the keyboard... ? On 10/18/12, Rory Walsh |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:22 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Because it is derived from the velocity with which the finger strikes the key, which in a piano is what controls how hard the hammer hits the string. Regards, Mike On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Rory Walsh |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:22 |
From | john saylor |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
On 10/18/12 16:19 , Rory Walsh wrote: > I'm just going to put it out there, and as the movie goes, if you > don't like you can send it back. How is it that the word 'velocity', > which I learned in school to be speed in a given direction, is the > word used to describe the amplitude of MIDI notes? because with an acoustic piano, the velocity/speed with which the key is depressed determines it's volume. test it to see! since the vast majority of MIDI controllers are keyboards, this relic from acoustic music performance stuck. -- \js [http://or8.net/~johns/] : i am alive |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:24 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Thanks guys. Top marks! Still kind of a misnomer though isn't it? Still, at least I can sleep easy now. And although I'm not a keyboard player, I have noticed that hitting the key quickly increased the amplitude ;) On 18 October 2012 21:22, Michael Gogins |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:28 |
From | Justin Smith |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
For bowed instrument controllers, velocity should clearly be mapped to timbre. And we would need a pressure parameter mapped to amplitude and also timbre, and a position parameter mapped to timbre, and a rosin, tension, and bridge material parameters at instrument initialization mapped to timbre. On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Rory Walsh |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:30 |
From | Michael Rhoades |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
I have always thought of it as how hard you hit the key as being the peak amplitude of the attack in the amplitude envelope. The velocity is the speed at which it reaches the peak of the attack portion of the envelope. On 10/18/12 4:24 PM, Rory Walsh wrote: > Thanks guys. Top marks! Still kind of a misnomer though isn't it? > Still, at least I can sleep easy now. And although I'm not a keyboard > player, I have noticed that hitting the key quickly increased the > amplitude ;) > > On 18 October 2012 21:22, Michael Gogins |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:35 |
From | Richard Dobson |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Not forgetting there is also a release velocity too! Richard Dobson On 18/10/2012 21:24, Rory Walsh wrote: > Thanks guys. Top marks! Still kind of a misnomer though isn't it? > Still, at least I can sleep easy now. And although I'm not a keyboard > player, I have noticed that hitting the key quickly increased the > amplitude ;) > |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:36 |
From | Justin Smith |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Attack envelope is not controllable separate from amplitude with a piano. And obviously piano is the canonical musical instrument upon which all abstractions should be based. On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Rhoades |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:44 |
From | Richard Dobson |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Like pretty much all MIDI parameters, it is sound-agnostic. It is entirely at the whim of the synth operator what use (if any) they make of velocity and other values. MIDI is a mechanical protocol, defining the operation of numbered switches and quasi-continuous controllers. Even such things as pitchbend are not defined by MIDI other than as just another controller position - you could in principle set it to control stereo pan if you want (though in some synths you may have to work hard to stop it changing pitch). There is nothing to stop you (other than what the synth designer allows you) mapping a high velocity to a slow attack, and a low velocity to a fast attack. And so on! Richard Dobson On 18/10/2012 21:30, Michael Rhoades wrote: > I have always thought of it as how hard you hit the key as being the > peak amplitude of the attack in the amplitude envelope. The velocity is > the speed at which it reaches the peak of the attack portion of the > envelope. > > > On 10/18/12 4:24 PM, Rory Walsh wrote: >> Thanks guys. Top marks! Still kind of a misnomer though isn't it? >> Still, at least I can sleep easy now. And although I'm not a keyboard >> player, I have noticed that hitting the key quickly increased the >> amplitude ;) >> |
Date | 2012-10-18 21:46 |
From | Michael Rhoades |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Are you sure? It would seem that the subtle nuance in the player's ability would stipulate this. The speed at which the hammer is flung at the string. Not sure. Interesting question Rory. As music programmers we do have that sort of control over the amplitude envelope and I think with a midi keyboard that is touch sensitive it can sense velocity. Of course that portion of the event, when played on a keyboard, is very fast. On 10/18/12 4:36 PM, Justin Smith wrote: > Attack envelope is not controllable separate from amplitude with a > piano. And obviously piano is the canonical musical instrument upon > which all abstractions should be based. > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Rhoades > |
Date | 2012-10-18 22:02 |
From | Justin Smith |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Physical piano keyboards are agnostic to pressure and respond to speed of movement. Electronic are usually agnostic to speed of movement and respond to pressure (though some do make the effort to emulate the piano key mechanism, and some subset of those may in fact measure speed rather than finger pressure, or indirectly measure speed by measuring hammer pressure which is determined by finger speed). On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Michael Rhoades |
Date | 2012-10-18 22:37 |
From | zappfinger |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: someone has to ask... |
It had to do with the hardware implementation in those days As soon as you pressed a key the first contact was triggered. When the key came down, the second contact was triggered. The time difference between the 2 contacts, thus the velocity, was a rough measure for the key pressure. Richard -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/someone-has-to-ask-tp5717033p5717048.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Date | 2012-10-18 22:43 |
From | Richard Boulanger |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Let's not forget... The Velocity of Love ----------------------------------------- Dr. Richard Boulanger, Ph.D. Professor of Electronic Production and Design Professional Writing and Music Technology Division Berklee College of Music 617-747-2485 (office) 774-488-9166 (cell) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Justin Smith <noisesmith@gmail.com> wrote: Physical piano keyboards are agnostic to pressure and respond to speed |
Date | 2012-10-19 01:45 |
From | PMA |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] someone has to ask... |
Just in case -- In (acoustic) piano playing, the velocity most directly affecting volume is that at which the hammer hits the string. This factor, as a sole determiner of volume, is more dependable than that of finger-stroke speed, whose influence depends more variably on the additional factors of force and direction. (One can, for instance, slap a key terrifically fast, but so very lightly that its hammer never reaches the string.) Pete Rory Walsh wrote: > Thanks guys. Top marks! Still kind of a misnomer though isn't it? > Still, at least I can sleep easy now. And although I'm not a keyboard > player, I have noticed that hitting the key quickly increased the > amplitude ;) > > On 18 October 2012 21:22, Michael Gogins |
Date | 2012-10-19 16:52 |
From | Jim Aikin |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: someone has to ask... |
Skimming through the thread, I'm not sure anybody mentioned that your initial question embodies a sort of conceptual slippage. The mapping of key velocity to note amplitude is arbitrary. The two (velocity and amplitude) are different beasts, and mapping the one to the other is not, in any good MIDI synthesizer, a requirement of the design -- it's just a generally useful mapping (because, as others have noted, it models the response of a piano). You can easily de-couple velocity from amplitude and use it for LFO rate or depth, for example, or the detuning amount of two oscillators. Or just toss the value out, if you don't need it. Most commercial synths come with organ presets, which typically have no velocity response at all. So the term "velocity" is not a misnomer -- it's an accurate description of what is being measured at the keyboard. (At least, on most keyboards. Some actually measure impact force, not velocity, and then translate that into a MIDI velocity value.) --JA -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/someone-has-to-ask-tp5717033p5717104.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |