RE: [Csnd] OT: DSP question
| Date | 2012-10-12 12:15 |
| From | "ndrweski@yahoo.fr" |
| Subject | RE: [Csnd] OT: DSP question |
Difficult to answer without audio, but i would say no unless those frequencies that the ears won't perceive but that the body will, are creating too much indesirable tension (phisicall).
-----Message d'origine-----
De:peiman khosravi
Envoyé: 12/10/2012, 13:09
A: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
Sujet: [Csnd] OT: DSP question
Dear all,
I'm in the process of bouncing down stems. Since I'm working at 96k and
mostly with spectral processes that may potentially produce high-energy
components above 20k I was wondering if I'd gain a little bit more headroom
by putting a mastering equaliser on my master track and gradually rolling
off everything above 22k or so? I've never done this but this piece is
really high-frequency orientated and I think this would make a big
difference.
Many Thanks
Peiman
Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
|
| Date | 2012-10-12 12:27 |
| From | Justin Smith |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: DSP question |
Removing inaudible frequencies will absolutely increase headroom. On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:15 AM, ndrweski@yahoo.fr |
| Date | 2012-10-12 12:35 |
| From | peiman khosravi |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: DSP question |
| Thanks Justin. Nicolas, I meant headroom in terms of dBFS rather than the perceived loudness. Cheers, Peiman On 12 October 2012 12:27, Justin Smith <noisesmith@gmail.com> wrote: Removing inaudible frequencies will absolutely increase headroom. |
| Date | 2012-10-12 15:02 |
| From | Michael Gogins |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: DSP question |
If you have float samples you could just increase your headroom -- there is more than enough to handle this. Then apply EQ at the end. I'd compare this with doing the EQ first using (a) ABX tests and (b) high-resolution, high-bandwidth spectrograph. Regards, Mike Gogins On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Justin Smith |
| Date | 2012-10-12 15:04 |
| From | peiman khosravi |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: DSP question |
| Thanks Mike, That's really good advice. Unfortunately protools 9 doesn't import/export float samples :-( Cheers, Peiman
On 12 October 2012 15:02, Michael Gogins <michael.gogins@gmail.com> wrote: If you have float samples you could just increase your headroom -- |