[Csnd] Booleans: goto vs then
| Date | 2017-12-22 14:18 |
| From | Hlöðver Sigurðsson |
| Subject | [Csnd] Booleans: goto vs then |
Somehow I had the impression that `then` was just a syntatical sugar for igoto/kgoto (depending the rate of the comparator test). But I'm bit surprised that these two examples aren't eqivalent
Csound mailing list
Csound@listserv.heanet.ie
https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND
Send bugs reports to
https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
gi1 ftgen 0, 0, 8192, 10, 1 instr ex1 if (p5 == 0) igoto case_0 igoto case_1 case_0: a10 vco 0.1, p4, 1, 0, gi1 igoto case_endif case_1: a10 poscil 0.1, p4, gi1 case_endif: outs a10, a10 endin instr ex2 if (p5 == 0) then a10 vco 0.1, p4, 1, 0, gi1 else a10 poscil 0.1, p4, gi1 endif outs a10, a10 endin ex1 throws this error PERF ERROR in instr 1: poscil: not initialised a10 poscil.a 0.1 p4 gi1 0 note aborted ex2 works fine. Some way to make ex1 work like this with gotos? |
| Date | 2017-12-22 15:00 |
| From | Hlöðver Sigurðsson |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] Booleans: goto vs then |
ah nevermind, my misunderstanding. It should be kgoto here, since it needs to be on performance-time. Took it that the comparator could only be i or k rate and the decision made once. On 22 December 2017 at 15:18, Hlöðver Sigurðsson <hlolli@gmail.com> wrote:
|