Hello again,

oops, I think it's resolved. -I should have listened to the files  
before posting instead of only looking at the console ;-)
-as written in the documentation, diskin2 accounts for different  
samplerates playing back a soundfile at its original pitch, which  
soundin and diskin don't seem to do.

my apologies again,
Marlon


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Schumacher Marlon 
> Date: 23. Mai 2009 16:55:15 GMT+02:00
> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> Subject: soundin/diskin vs diskin2
>
> Hello List,
>
> I noticed that when using soundin or diskin I obtain slightly lower  
> (appr. 1 db) overall amplitudes compared to diskin2. Is this a  
> normal/correct behaviour or perhaps related to other params of  
> diskin2? -I was assuming soundin should be the most CPU-efficient  
> opcode for simple soundfile playback (no transposition), right?
>
> many thanks,
> cheers,
> Marlon