Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[Csnd] Re: Re: Editors

Date2008-01-07 18:54
Frommark jamerson
Subject[Csnd] Re: Re: Editors
 I use the latest version of WinXound_Net.  Since I'm still rather new to Csound(2 years) I like the manual/help tab that is easily accessible while working on the code.  I can flip back and forth without changing windows.  My one complaint is that WinXound's error reporting is non-existent, so I use Lettuce to quickly run a CSD if I can't find the error.  I will probably switch to full usage of Lettuce as it gets more developed.  

                                     Mark 

----- Original Message ----
From: Jacob Joaquin 
To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2008 9:15:12 AM
Subject: [Csnd] Re: Re: Editors



Since we're on the subject of editors, I'd like to pose a question to
 the
list:  What is your preferred text editor for writing Csound code?

Text editors for us Csounders is the pseudo-equivalent of our choice of
staff paper and writing utensils.  I'm personally a bit curious as to
whether some of you use a pencil or quill.  I myself use jEdit,
 combined
with running Csound from the terminal.  In the past, I've used bbedit,
crimson editor, and even dabbled a little in emacs.

Best,
Jake
---- 
The Csound Blog 
http://www.thumbuki.com/csound/blog/



Victor.Lazzarini wrote:
> 
> In this religious battle, I am an emacs-faithful. I could never stand
 ed,
> so vi and vim have never attracted me.I like the idea that you can do
> almost anything out ofemacs (except making toast perhaps).Victor-----

-- 
View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Editors-tp14662222p14668154.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body
 "unsubscribe csound"





      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Date2008-02-04 23:52
FromDavidW
Subject[Csnd] Re: Re: Editors
>
Further to our recent discussion of editors, has anyone checked out  
Peppy?"

http://peppy.flipturn.org/

I quote from a recent post to the pythonmac list:
> Nehemiah Dacres wrote:
>> What is the difference between this editor and editra
>
> The big difference is that Peppy has been designed to be more flexible
> and expendable -- I think it has the potential to be a really great
> editor for ALL types of text files (and some others -- binary, etc.).
> Some of the key features:
>
>  - user-definable key bindings, including emacs style multi-key  
> bindings.
>
>  - User definable major-modes for different file types. (and I think
> they are inheritable, so you could create one that was almost like an
> existing mode, then add/change a bit for your use.
>
>  - Minor modes -- these are kind of like mix-ins -- extra  
> functionality
> you can tack onto various major modes -- like word wrapping etc.
>
>  - You can view the same buffer (file) in multiple windows at the same
> time.
>
> Is does currently lack a bit of polish, particularly on the Mac.
>
>
> Editra (and PyPE, SPE, ulipad, etc....), on the other hand has been
> built to do what it does well, but without the built-in flexibility.  
> No
> different modes, no user-definable key bindings, etc. It does work
> better for the basic stuff out-of-the-box, but I've bumped into limits
> already with it.
>
> In short, the developers have taken a different tack -- Peppy has been
> designed from the ground up with a focus on getting a flexible (and
> admittedly complex) framework in place, with some of the usability
> details on the back burner. Editra, on the other hand, has focused on
> getting basic functionality in place, including the usability  
> niceties.
> This does make early version more usable, but I think, in the long  
> run,
> Peppy has more room to grow.
>
>> and is there any
>> possibility that i would be able to use this via a console?
>
> I think there is a possibility in the future that a console mode could
> be built -- it's got good separation of functionality from UI, but  
> there
>  is only a wx UI at the moment -- I don't think he has plans for a
> console version.
>
> -Chris
>
> PS: Peppy is the only editor other than (X)emacs that has a python  
> mode
> that does indentation right.
>
> -Chris


_______________________________________________


________________________________________________
David Worrall.
- Experimental Polymedia:	www.avatar.com.au
- Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au
Australian research affiliations:
- Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre: www.cmcrc.com
- Sonic Communications Research Group:	creative.canberra.edu.au/scrg
- MARCS Auditory Laboratories: marcs.uws.edu.au