| On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Tobiah wrote:
> Michael Mossey wrote:
>>
>> Recently I made an offer of $100 for cound.com. I actually got a reply,
>> telling me the minimum offer is 2000 euros. And they aren't likely to accept
>> that either---more likely to hold out for a better offer.
>
> Yeah, they may have spent a recognizable portion of $100 already, just
> squatting.
Let them continue spending.
>> My opinion is that owning csound.com would make very little difference
>> with regard to web traffic, but it's just a nice feeling for the community
>> to own its own name.
>
> Yeah, not a huge deal, but it would be nice. I actually still think that
> csound.org is more important anyway, as csound is not a commercial product.
> Reminder to Dr. B to point csound.org to csounds.com.
Absolutely. ardour.com doesn't appear to be linked to Ardour. I
don't think going to csound.com will stop anyone from finding
csounds.com, especially since there are a couple links there to
csounds.com.
The ONLY way that squatter will make any return at all on the
csound.com domain is if the Csound community buys it from him; outside
of that, he loses money. The inverse of a monopoly- only one
potential customer. If the squatter doesn't like our terms, let them
throw money away. He has two choices- offer a lower price or make no
profit- and somehow sees a nonexistent third choice. Kind of funny.
-Chuckk
--
http://www.badmuthahubbard.com
|