Re: [Csnd] Cabbage v0.03.03 (OSX 10.6)
Date | 2012-09-16 15:22 |
From | john ffitch |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Cabbage v0.03.03 (OSX 10.6) |
When is the Linux version scheduled to appear? ==John ffitch |
Date | 2012-09-16 15:25 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Cabbage v0.03.03 (OSX 10.6) |
Good question. I'm not sure about the best way to distribute it on linux. Currently the build system is completely self-contained. There is little need for any external dependencies. I just need to update the makefiles. Is it Ok to expect people to be able to build it themselves? I can of course prepare binaries for Ubuntu as it's the flavour of linux I use. On 16 September 2012 15:22, john ffitch |
Date | 2012-09-16 17:07 |
From | Dave Phillips |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Cabbage v0.03.03 (OSX 10.6) |
On 09/16/12 10:25, Rory Walsh wrote: > Good question. I'm not sure about the best way to distribute it on > linux. Currently the build system is completely self-contained. There > is little need for any external dependencies. I just need to update > the makefiles. Is it Ok to expect people to be able to build it > themselves? I can of course prepare binaries for Ubuntu as it's the > flavour of linux I use. > In this instance I would say, yes, you should expect Linux users to build it. At some point someone may decide to manage a package and save you the hassle. Meanwhile, if your system is self-contained then there should be little or no difficulty compiling it locally. Those are also known as "famous last words". :) Eager to try some Cabbage here, dp |