[Csnd] using ftgen or ftgenonce or ftgentmp in a specific instrument
Date | 2012-09-08 20:13 |
From | Stefan Thomas |
Subject | [Csnd] using ftgen or ftgenonce or ftgentmp in a specific instrument |
Dear community, I use the following ftable in an instrument with number 101 iwave ftgen 0, 0, 2^13, 11, inumparts, 1, ibright Inumparts and and ibright are dependend on midikey and keyvelocity. I have the feeling that this instrument needs more working memory than others, there seem to be more buffer underruns than in other patches. I want to ask You if it would be better to use ftgenonce or ftgentmp, or wouldn't that make a difference? |
Date | 2012-09-08 23:46 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] using ftgen or ftgenonce or ftgentmp in a specific instrument |
Use ftgenonce in this case. The table will be allocated the first time that instr 101 is invoked. The next time instr 101 is invoked, the table will be looked up from its arguments, and re-used. Regards, Mike On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Stefan Thomas |
Date | 2012-09-09 09:04 |
From | Stefan Thomas |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] using ftgen or ftgenonce or ftgentmp in a specific instrument |
Thanks, I' will try it with ftgenonce. 2012/9/9 Michael Gogins <michael.gogins@gmail.com> Use ftgenonce in this case. The table will be allocated the first time |
Date | 2012-09-09 09:40 |
From | Stefan Thomas |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] using ftgen or ftgenonce or ftgentmp in a specific instrument |
Or would it maybee be better to use gbuzz instead of gen11? Those 2 do more ore less the same, don't they? 2012/9/9 Stefan Thomas <kontrapunktstefan@gmail.com> Thanks, I' will try it with ftgenonce. |