[Csnd] improvisation in 53tet
Date | 2013-09-09 23:01 |
From | Stefan Thomas |
Subject | [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
Dear community, during the last weeks I've made experiments with 53 pitches per octave. |
Date | 2013-09-10 09:22 |
From | Oeyvind Brandtsegg |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
Thanks for sharing, it is interesting to hear. The tuning system is quite unfamiliar for me, but would it be correct to say that with this many subdivisions it approaches a continuous pitch field? In the section starting at 9:20 is sounds as if there is a pitch bend, but perhaps it is just a result of the density of the tuning system and the way that chords are clustered, releasing some notes will let the whole chord (perceptually) "slide" in pitch? best Oeyvind 2013/9/10 Stefan Thomas |
Date | 2013-09-10 09:22 |
From | Tarmo Johannes |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
Very nice!
Both the intervals and structure of different densities. How did you construct the scale?
tarmo
On Tuesday 10 September 2013 00:01:03 Stefan Thomas wrote: Dear community, during the last weeks I've made experiments with 53 pitches per octave. On https://soundcloud.com/stefan-thomas-6 You can listen to an improvisation I've made at home. I use a piano-like sound, made with FM synthesis, created with csound. With the help of a midi foot controller I was able to change the register. At the end I use multitap-delay extensively. Hope You find it interesting. As I mentioned, it is an improvisation, with an concept, but mostly intuitive. I'm going to make an exactly written composition out of my ideas and this material. Any suggestions,annotations and comments are very welcome, no matter if they are critical or encouraging. |
Date | 2013-09-10 09:38 |
From | Stefan Thomas |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
Dear Tarmo, thanks for Your reply.2013/9/10 Tarmo Johannes <tarmo.johannes@otsakool.edu.ee>
|
Date | 2013-09-10 09:43 |
From | Stefan Thomas |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
Dear Oeyvind, no, I didn't use pitch bending. But You are right, the very dense clusters sound a bit like a continous pitch field.2013/9/10 Oeyvind Brandtsegg <oyvind.brandtsegg@ntnu.no> Thanks for sharing, it is interesting to hear. The tuning system is |
Date | 2013-09-10 10:03 |
From | Richard Dobson |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
It has quite a history. This page discusses the maths of the whole sorry business of e.t. tunings, and via a brief detour via the Golden Section eventually celebrates the insufficiently sung hero of 53-note e.t., King Fang, ca 40 BC: http://oeis.org/DUNNE/TEMPERAMENT.HTML Richard Dobson On 10/09/2013 09:22, Oeyvind Brandtsegg wrote: > Thanks for sharing, it is interesting to hear. The tuning system is > quite unfamiliar for me, but would it be correct to say that with this > many subdivisions it approaches a continuous pitch field? > In the section starting at 9:20 is sounds as if there is a pitch bend, > but perhaps it is just a result of the density of the tuning system > and the way that chords are clustered, releasing some notes will let > the whole chord (perceptually) "slide" in pitch? > > best > Oeyvind > |
Date | 2013-09-10 10:14 |
From | zappfinger |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: improvisation in 53tet |
You might find this interesting: http://www.cortex-design.com/projects_terp2.htm Richard -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/improvisation-in-53tet-tp5727516p5727530.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Date | 2013-09-10 11:01 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
He says he will be talking about tuning of pianos and I thought he was going to mention the inharmonicity of piano strings, but he didn't. Victor On 10 Sep 2013, at 10:03, Richard Dobson wrote: > It has quite a history. This page discusses the maths of the whole sorry business of e.t. tunings, and via a brief detour via the Golden Section eventually celebrates the insufficiently sung hero of 53-note e.t., King Fang, ca 40 BC: > > http://oeis.org/DUNNE/TEMPERAMENT.HTML > > Richard Dobson > > > On 10/09/2013 09:22, Oeyvind Brandtsegg wrote: >> Thanks for sharing, it is interesting to hear. The tuning system is >> quite unfamiliar for me, but would it be correct to say that with this >> many subdivisions it approaches a continuous pitch field? >> In the section starting at 9:20 is sounds as if there is a pitch bend, >> but perhaps it is just a result of the density of the tuning system >> and the way that chords are clustered, releasing some notes will let >> the whole chord (perceptually) "slide" in pitch? >> >> best >> Oeyvind >> > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug trackers > csound6: > https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/tickets/ > csound5: > https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/bugs/ > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > > Dr Victor Lazzarini Senior Lecturer Dept. of Music NUI Maynooth Ireland tel.: +353 1 708 3545 Victor dot Lazzarini AT nuim dot ie |
Date | 2013-09-10 11:24 |
From | Richard Dobson |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
Yes indeed, I assume he is writing primarily about the maths, and the problem of stretched octaves etc would add inconvenient complications which would obscure the core mathematical issues of temperament. For stretch tuning the canonical reference is the proposition of Serge Cordier to tune the piano using an e.t. division of (pure) perfect fifths, giving a systematic stretching of all octaves. A modern web reference is here: http://www.pykett.org.uk/impureoctaves.htm I have somewhere the original typescript document produced by Cordier, who presented it a long time ago at the Menuhin school, including a performance demonstration with a string quartet (strings tuned in perfect fifths, giving a particularly clean blend with the piano). I have no idea how widely this method is adopted by working piano tuners, however. Richard Dobson On 10/09/2013 11:01, Victor Lazzarini wrote: > He says he will be talking about tuning of pianos and I thought he > was going to mention the inharmonicity of piano strings, but he > didn't. > > Victor On 10 Sep 2013, at 10:03, Richard Dobson wrote: > >> It has quite a history. This page discusses the maths of the whole >> sorry business of e.t. tunings, and via a brief detour via the >> Golden Section eventually celebrates the insufficiently sung hero >> of 53-note e.t., King Fang, ca 40 BC: >> >> http://oeis.org/DUNNE/TEMPERAMENT.HTML >> |
Date | 2013-09-10 11:36 |
From | Stefan Thomas |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] improvisation in 53tet |
Yes, tuning has a long and interesting history and one can doubt seriously, if the conventional 12 pitches per octave is an ideal solution. I don't think, that 53 pitches per octave will be the solution for the next century and I must say, I'm not a dogmatic follower of the religion of just intonation. I just like to experiment with different tuning systems and therefore csound can be a nice and useful tool.2013/9/10 Richard Dobson <richarddobson@blueyonder.co.uk> It has quite a history. This page discusses the maths of the whole sorry business of e.t. tunings, and via a brief detour via the Golden Section eventually celebrates the insufficiently sung hero of 53-note e.t., King Fang, ca 40 BC: |