| There are several months between when a writer submits an article and when it shows up on newsstands. So it will take a while to see if Aikin's article shows up.
Regards,
Mike
-----Original Message-----
>From: rasputin
>Sent: Jul 1, 2008 4:13 PM
>To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
>Subject: [Csnd] Re: Csound Wiki FUBAR -> leads to these thoughts
>
>
>
>mark jamerson wrote:
>>
>>
>> The Csound Wiki has been completely bombarded with hacking, and I can't
>> seem to find the revert option anywhere. Is anyone still acting as
>> administrator to it, or has it been abandoned? Just curious.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
>I had the idea: if there were a Csound WIKI, it might help address the
>problems of a Csound beginner (which I still consider myself to be.) So when
>I went to where it used to be, then found this posting, I was somewhat
>dejected.
>
>I found the recent discussions with Jim Aikin very interesting since (a) he
>is definitely not a beginner when it comes to electronic music technology
>and (b) it was his goal to be able to write an article that would make
>Csound comprehensible to an interested musician, presumably relatively
>conversant with both electronic music and computer technology. Apparently he
>sort of abandoned the project as too intractable.
>
>A wiki for Csound would have some definite advantages. One of the problems I
>continually encounter in my explorations is the detritus of the past. Csound
>is so venerable, and has been worked on by so many people, that the archives
>are littered with projects that have been superseded, discontinued or
>updated. Like CsoundVST to take just one example. Searching for that you
>find that it was included in some versions of Csound but not the latest,
>discussions of the Silence system, CsoundAC, and so forth. But there's no
>simple way to find out what (a) its latest status is and (b) how to simply
>use it in a particular host.
>
>A wiki would allow for easy location of information about peoples'
>particular interests: Csound tutorials, various front ends that are still
>supported and/or used, GUIs and editors that are still relevant, the API and
>its hooks for various languages, real time and MIDI use, use as a VST,
>history, building from source on different platforms, etc. etc. Right now
>all that information is spread across hundreds of websites, countless
>articles in this forum, and elsewhere.
>
>The biggest advantage of a wiki, the way I'm thinking now, is that hopefully
>only the newest information will go in at first. For instance, which version
>of Python you need to work with Csound, and how you need to install and
>configure it.
>
>I could go on but this probably outlines my thoughts. Hopefully there is
>little enough controversy in Csound that there would need to be any
>moderation issues. Spammers and hackers are always a problem, of course, but
>other wikis seem to be able to operate.
>
>Here's one for Python documentation http://www.python.org/doc/
>One for Cakewalk's Project5 application
>http://p5.sonarama.com/index.php?title=Home
>And the one for ChucK http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK
>
>None of these are perfect but they should roughly convey the idea...
>--
>View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Csound-Wiki-FUBAR-tp14806903p18224377.html
>Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>Send bugs reports to this list.
>To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
|