[Csnd] "line" opcode broken?

Date	2008-07-16 19:31
From	rasputin
Subject	[Csnd] "line" opcode broken?
	Am I missing something entirely fundamental? kcps line 880, 1, 660, 1, 660 (from the example program in the line documentation) gives a "too many arguments" error. Using three arguments seems to work OK. Is this opcode deprecated? Is the documentation in error? ("values can pass through 2 or more specified points") I realize there are options (particularly linseg), but I discovered this when trying to run old example files. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22line%22-opcode-broken--tp18493814p18493814.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Date	2008-07-16 19:42
From	peiman khosravi
Subject	[Csnd] Re: "line" opcode broken?
	I think that's a mistake in the documentation. Line I believe only takes three arguments: first value, length, second value. Like: kcps linseg 880, 1, 660 However you could use lineseg instead, so just change your code to: kcps linseg 880, 1, 660, 1, 660 Best Peiman On 16 Jul 2008, at 19:31, rasputin wrote: Am I missing something entirely fundamental? kcps line 880, 1, 660, 1, 660 (from the example program in the line documentation) gives a "too many arguments" error. Using three arguments seems to work OK. Is this opcode deprecated? Is the documentation in error? ("values can pass through 2 or more specified points") I realize there are options (particularly linseg), but I discovered this when trying to run old example files. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22line%22-opcode-broken--tp18493814p18493814.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Send bugs reports to this list. To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"

Date	2008-07-16 21:45
From	rasputin
Subject	[Csnd] Re: "line" opcode broken?
	Andres Cabrera wrote: > > Thanks. The example is wrong. I've fixed it in cvs. > > Cheers, > Andrés > Thanks to everyone who answered so quickly. And thankst to Andres for fixing the example. Does a bug report need to be opened against the documentation itself then, to fix the "2 or more" phrasing? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22line%22-opcode-broken--tp18493814p18496258.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.