| That being said, it was good to read the report - thanks Mike.
David.
On 10/07/2008, at 3:42 AM, Michael Gogins wrote:
> I'm sorry I misrepresented your remarks, and with your permission I am
> forwarding your clarifications to the Csound lists.
>
> Best,
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Judy Klein
>> Sent: Jul 9, 2008 10:41 AM
>> To: Michael Gogins
>> Subject: Re: Minutes of NYCSUG Meeting
>>
>>
>> Michael,
>>
>> I've read the User Group meeting minutes you posted to the Csound
>> lists and cc-d to me. It should be made clear that I did not
>> "report" on jurying in Bourges, which suggests detail and formality,
>> and which would have been inappropriate for me to do. Also, I did
>> not say that my "personal" use of Csound was considered impressive.
>> Rather, I told you that that a number of composers at the festival
>> expressed admiration for the use of Csound (It would be anyone's use
>> of the language), which they esteem to be more difficult to learn
>> than the software they are using themselves. Would you please post
>> these corrections? Your wording of the minutes has caused me quite a
>> bit of embarrassment.
>>
>> Thanks very much,
>>
>> Judy
>
________________________________________________
David Worrall.
- Experimental Polymedia: www.avatar.com.au
- Education for Financial Independence: www.mindthemarkets.com.au
Australian research affiliations:
- Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre: www.cmcrc.com
- Sonic Communications Research Group: creative.canberra.edu.au/scrg
|