[Csnd] total number of instr instances?
Date | 2010-08-10 09:37 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] total number of instr instances? |
Maybe I'm missing something obvious but is there an opcode that will retrieve the total number of instances of an instrument since the start of a performance? I'm aware of the 'active' opcode but I would like the total number of instances not the current number.. Rory. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-08-10 09:55 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: total number of instr instances? |
It should be easy enough to use a global variable to count them up. Victor On 10 Aug 2010, at 09:37, Rory Walsh wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something obvious but is there an opcode that will > retrieve the total number of instances of an instrument since the > start of a performance? I'm aware of the 'active' opcode but I would > like the total number of instances not the current number.. > > Rory. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-08-10 09:56 |
From | jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: total number of instr instances? |
Initialise a global i variable to 0 Add one in each instrument or have I misunderstood? > Maybe I'm missing something obvious but is there an opcode that will > retrieve the total number of instances of an instrument since the > start of a performance? I'm aware of the 'active' opcode but I would > like the total number of instances not the current number.. > > Rory. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe > csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-08-10 09:58 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
I was thinking about that, just thought there might be a more eloquent way. Cheers, Rory. On 10 August 2010 09:55, Victor Lazzarini |
Date | 2010-08-10 10:10 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
I guess that should be eloquent enough ;) On 10 Aug 2010, at 09:58, Rory Walsh wrote: > I was thinking about that, just thought there might be a more eloquent > way. Cheers, > > Rory. > > > On 10 August 2010 09:55, Victor Lazzarini |
Date | 2010-08-10 21:03 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
No you haven't misunderstood John, I was just wondering if there was an opcode to do it. As Victor pointed out using a global variable is simple enough to warrant a dedicated opcode useless! On 10 August 2010 09:56, |
Date | 2010-08-12 12:52 |
From | Enrico Francioni |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: total number of instr instances? |
…perhaps with active opcode? e -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/total-number-of-instr-instances-tp2401903p2473143.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-08-12 13:13 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
Hi Enrico, 'active' won't retrieve this information. It will only retrieve the current number of instances. Using global variables works fine. Rory. On 12 August 2010 12:52, Enrico Francioni |
Date | 2010-08-12 14:36 |
From | jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
> Hi Enrico, 'active' won't retrieve this information. It will only > retrieve the current number of instances. Using global variables works > fine. > > Rory. > but wait until 5.13! A brand new, totally untested opcode called totalinst returnd th etotal number of instances that have been started in this endering. Code in CVS now, description in manual, exampole not written yet ==John ff Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-08-12 14:41 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
Great, I can't wait to get rid of those out of instr block global variables! Really though you should have given that it's so straightforward. I only asked as there was already an active opcode. I wonder would it make more sense to simply add a flag to the active opcode to specify total instance number since start of performance with a default value for total number of current active instances? On 12 August 2010 14:36, |
Date | 2010-08-12 14:44 |
From | jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
Could be a variant on active -- whatever the community wants. Internally it is similar but neededextra data in the TEXT structure. As an option to acyive it would save a name... Anyone care? > Great, I can't wait to get rid of those out of instr block global > variables! Really though you should have given that it's so > straightforward. I only asked as there was already an active opcode. I > wonder would it make more sense to simply add a flag to the active > opcode to specify total instance number since start of performance > with a default value for total number of current active instances? > > > On 12 August 2010 14:36, |
Date | 2010-08-12 14:47 |
From | Joel Ross |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
It would perhaps be easier to find if it was in the same place. Regards, Joel On 12 August 2010 15:44, |
Date | 2010-08-12 14:50 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: total number of instr instances? |
I think the option on active is probably a better solution. Victor On 12 Aug 2010, at 14:44, jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk wrote: > Could be a variant on active -- whatever the community wants. > Internally > it is similar but neededextra data in the TEXT structure. As an > option to > acyive it would save a name... Anyone care? > > > >> Great, I can't wait to get rid of those out of instr block global >> variables! Really though you should have given that it's so >> straightforward. I only asked as there was already an active >> opcode. I >> wonder would it make more sense to simply add a flag to the active >> opcode to specify total instance number since start of performance >> with a default value for total number of current active instances? >> >> >> On 12 August 2010 14:36, |