[Csnd] Musical input methods most people use
Date | 2011-07-09 04:49 |
From | "Arthur Pirika" |
Subject | [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
Hi, what method of input do most people use for getting music out of cSound? Does anyone still use the traditional score file? Do most use midi? or do most use some other form of composing? I'd use nGen, but that seems to be hard to get, though I do have a copy. So what other music input languages work well with csound? Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-09 11:12 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
I now use Lua, I used to use Python, and before that I used Java. Occasionally, notation software with CsoundVST. Some people use spreadsheets, some people use Csound score language, there are many composing systems like blue or Common Music or surmolot that people use.
I don't ever do live performance (yet) but if I did I would probably use MIDI. Hope this helps, Mike
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Arthur Pirika <arfy32@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, what method of input do most people use for getting music out of cSound? Does anyone still use the traditional score file? Do most use midi? or do most use some other form of composing? I'd use nGen, but that seems to be hard to get, though I do have a copy. So what other music input languages work well with csound? -- Michael Gogins Irreducible Productions http://www.michael-gogins.com Michael dot Gogins at gmail dot com |
Date | 2011-07-09 11:30 |
From | Nil Geisweiller |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Michael Gogins |
Date | 2011-07-09 11:45 |
From | Brian Redfern |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
For me I started getting into Michael's Lua system because I couldn't get pythonac to work on ubuntu. I use midi a lot, and now trying to learn OSC so I can write a better OSC front end for android than the currently available ones. Its not easy to use, but it seems to be the best bet for using my android device as a controller for csound. On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Nil Geisweiller |
Date | 2011-07-09 12:32 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
For me it's MIDI controllers all the way. I've become one with my uc-33! On Saturday, 9 July 2011, Brian Redfern |
Date | 2011-07-09 13:02 |
From | jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
Called me old-fashioned but I either ewrite Csound score events, or write C programs to generate score events. For real-time/performance I use wiimotes directly driving event opcodes and the like ==John ff > For me it's MIDI controllers all the way. I've become one with my uc-33! > > On Saturday, 9 July 2011, Brian Redfern |
Date | 2011-07-09 14:15 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
Because on x86 architecture, luajit is by far the fastest dynamic language, at times a fast as c. On Jul 9, 2011 6:30 AM, "Nil Geisweiller" <ngeiswei@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Michael Gogins <michael.gogins@gmail.com> wrote: >> I now use Lua, I used to use Python, and before that I used Java. > > Interesting, why do you use Lua over Python? I'm used to thinking > Python is more "user friendly", although I must say I only know little > about Lua. > > Cheers > Nil > >> Occasionally, notation software with CsoundVST. >> Some people use spreadsheets, some people use Csound score language, there >> are many composing systems like blue or Common Music or surmolot that people >> use. >> I don't ever do live performance (yet) but if I did I would probably use >> MIDI. >> Hope this helps, >> Mike >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Arthur Pirika <arfy32@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, what method of input do most people use for getting music out of >>> cSound? Does anyone still use the traditional score file? Do most use midi? >>> or do most use some other form of composing? I'd use nGen, but that seems to >>> be hard to get, though I do have a copy. So what other music input languages >>> work well with csound? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker >>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 >>> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe >>> csound" >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Michael Gogins >> Irreducible Productions >> http://www.michael-gogins.com >> Michael dot Gogins at gmail dot com >> > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-09 15:20 |
From | Samuel Sagan |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
MIDI keyboards and nothing else. -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-09 15:43 |
From | Brian Wong |
Subject | RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that is just me. Brian Wong > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > From: samuelsagan@gmail.com > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > > -- > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-09 16:16 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
Speaking of MIDI being on the way out has anyone come across any OSC supported hardware controllers? The poor resolution of MIDI CC messages is a constant PITA. Rory. On 9 July 2011 15:43, Brian Wong |
Date | 2011-07-09 16:20 |
From | Jacob Joaquin |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
The traditional Csound score is what I use most often. Though I do use Python to generate scores, and Processing for getting Csound to talk to other systems. On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Arthur Pirika <arfy32@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, what method of input do most people use for getting music out of cSound? Does anyone still use the traditional score file? Do most use midi? or do most use some other form of composing? I'd use nGen, but that seems to be hard to get, though I do have a copy. So what other music input languages work well with csound? |
Date | 2011-07-09 16:26 |
From | Brian Wong |
Subject | RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
The Eigenharp is the only thing I would describe as an actual full-featured musical instrument that PLANS to be fully OSC compatible currently, though quite a few software OSC applications have been created that use a computer as a controller. I don't consider a computer interface (touch screen, keyboard, mouse) a real musical instrument. Now if they had Roger Linn's pressure sensitive touch screen.......oh but never mind, he can't get funding. BW
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 16:16:00 +0100 > From: rorywalsh@ear.ie > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > Speaking of MIDI being on the way out has anyone come across any OSC > supported hardware controllers? The poor resolution of MIDI CC > messages is a constant PITA. > > Rory. > > > On 9 July 2011 15:43, Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> wrote: > > As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with > > Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score > > language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a > > Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of > > Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For > > realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. > > I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the > > way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to > > eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that > > is just me. > > Brian Wong > > > >> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > >> From: samuelsagan@gmail.com > >> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > >> Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > >> > >> MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > >> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > >> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe > >> csound" > >> > > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-09 16:45 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
I should have added that even though I use MIDI with Csound all the time, it's not always for real-time application. I'll usually load my Csound instrument into Renoise or Live. I'll then start a live session controlling my instrument with MIDI sliders. When I start to get somewhere I hit record and record all the automation from my sliders into the Renoise session. I then go back and audition what I've done. I can then tweak the automation manually. I guess it's like playing a keyboard into Sibelius and then going back after to edit what you've played. In the end I have a full automated score for my Csound instrument. On top of that that I let Renoise look after all the MIDI mapping so I don't have to mess around with MIDI opcodes in Csound. Rory. On 9 July 2011 16:26, Brian Wong |
Date | 2011-07-09 16:45 |
From | Steven Yi |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
I use my software blue for composing, and within that I use various ways of score creation depending on the musical needs at the time. I often use csound SCO or Python script, though sometimes I use a PianoRoll or other blue SoundObject. I think that different types of musical ideas best work with different representations, and it's a matter of finding the best tool to represent what you're trying to create. For realtime, I only use it for sketch work. I use blueLive which is within blue, that allows me to work with soundObjects in realtime, as well as use blue's MIDI system to play instruments too. On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Brian Wong |
Date | 2011-07-09 16:47 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
p.s. it is a real pity more hardware controllers don't support osc :( On 9 July 2011 16:45, Rory Walsh |
Date | 2011-07-09 16:58 |
From | Brian Wong |
Subject | RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
Maybe if people stopped dumping money, time, and effort into obsolete tech and actually supported real attempts to move forward (that are happening right now) that might possibly happen. Of course one could say the same about fossil-fuel automobiles, and we can all see just how cleverly our brilliant invisible hand of the free market is handling that one..... Brian > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 16:47:06 +0100 > From: rorywalsh@ear.ie > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > p.s. it is a real pity more hardware controllers don't support osc :( > > On 9 July 2011 16:45, Rory Walsh <rorywalsh@ear.ie> wrote: > > I should have added that even though I use MIDI with Csound all the > > time, it's not always for real-time application. I'll usually load my > > Csound instrument into Renoise or Live. I'll then start a live session > > controlling my instrument with MIDI sliders. When I start to get > > somewhere I hit record and record all the automation from my sliders > > into the Renoise session. I then go back and audition what I've done. > > I can then tweak the automation manually. I guess it's like playing a > > keyboard into Sibelius and then going back after to edit what you've > > played. In the end I have a full automated score for my Csound > > instrument. On top of that that I let Renoise look after all the MIDI > > mapping so I don't have to mess around with MIDI opcodes in Csound. > > > > Rory. > > > > > > On 9 July 2011 16:26, Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> The Eigenharp is the only thing I would describe as an actual full-featured > >> musical instrument that PLANS to be fully OSC compatible currently, though > >> quite a few software OSC applications have been created that use a computer > >> as a controller. I don't consider a computer interface (touch screen, > >> keyboard, mouse) a real musical instrument. Now if they had Roger Linn's > >> pressure sensitive touch screen.......oh but never mind, he can't get > >> funding. > >> BW > >> > >>> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 16:16:00 +0100 > >>> From: rorywalsh@ear.ie > >>> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > >>> Subject: Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > >>> > >>> Speaking of MIDI being on the way out has anyone come across any OSC > >>> supported hardware controllers? The poor resolution of MIDI CC > >>> messages is a constant PITA. > >>> > >>> Rory. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 9 July 2011 15:43, Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> > As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used > >>> > with > >>> > Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score > >>> > language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a > >>> > Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version > >>> > of > >>> > Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For > >>> > realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes > >>> > OSC. > >>> > I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on > >>> > the > >>> > way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to > >>> > eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But > >>> > that > >>> > is just me. > >>> > Brian Wong > >>> > > >>> >> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > >>> >> From: samuelsagan@gmail.com > >>> >> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > >>> >> Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > >>> >> > >>> >> MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> View this message in context: > >>> >> > >>> >> http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > >>> >> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > >>> >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > >>> >> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > >>> >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > >>> >> "unsubscribe > >>> >> csound" > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > >>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > >>> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe > >>> csound" > >>> > >> > > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-09 17:08 |
From | Dave Seidel |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
I use Steven Yi's blue nearly all of the time, and often use Python within blue. I have done some work with MIDI controllers (non-keyboard) with help from Art Hunkins, but would rather use OSC, and am considering experimenting with that using my Droid as a controller. I'm also very interested in using my Auduino (a synth based on the Arduino) as a controller -- my brother has been working with PD using an Auduino controller via USB, and I'd like to see if I can do this directly with Csound. In general, I use Csound for pre-rendered/composed pieces and a motley collection of pedals and other hardware devices when I improvise in a live context, but this could change over time. - Dave On 7/8/2011 11:49 PM, Arthur Pirika wrote: > Hi, what method of input do most people use for getting music out of > cSound? Does anyone still use the traditional score file? Do most use > midi? or do most use some other form of composing? I'd use nGen, but > that seems to be hard to get, though I do have a copy. So what other > music input languages work well with csound? Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-09 17:12 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
I remember reading that Matt Ingalls wrote an opcode for using the arduino with Csound some time back. You'll have to search the archives. On 9 July 2011 17:08, Dave Seidel |
Date | 2011-07-09 17:19 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
If there is an Arduino opcode it would be really wonderful to have it available in this next release. Any news on this? Any news on the next release? Sent from my iPhone. On Jul 9, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Rory Walsh |
Date | 2011-07-09 17:20 |
From | Michael Rhoades |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
Hi All... Thank you for talking about your various processes... It is always inspiring. I find this very interesting. Here is my current perspective... I am still using the "traditional" orc/sco combination. For score manipulation I often use Excel. For score generation I use Cmask and sometimes Mathematica. Anymore I almost always begin with a set of approximately 6 seconds long samples, which are then, through several iterations, used to build a composition. It is a constructive/deconstructive/reconstructive/combinatorial process where the sample might often be broken down to grains and then built back into a completely new sounds and combinations of sounds. I gather samples from sounds that I record or ones that I synthesize. I love working with Absynth and Metasynth to generate the base samples. And often friends will contribute samples they gather or create for me to work with. Since the micro structure of the base samples has much to do with the macro structure of the finished composition, I always consider the sample providers to be collaborators... I am always looking for ways to vary sections of a piece... the old theme and variation paradigm. Through the centuries one way to do that has been through transposition. Raising or lowering a phrase or section by a given interval... a simple variation. But lately I have been using exponential functions from a transpositional perspective. This allows for a more complex transposition the source of which is often still recognizable... Enjoy!! On 7/8/11 11:49 PM, Arthur Pirika wrote: > Hi, what method of input do most people use for getting music out of > cSound? Does anyone still use the traditional score file? Do most use > midi? or do most use some other form of composing? I'd use nGen, but > that seems to be hard to get, though I do have a copy. So what other > music input languages work well with csound? > > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-09 17:27 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/serial-communication-opcodes-for-Arduino-etc-td3244285.html#a3244446 On 9 July 2011 17:20, Michael Rhoades |
Date | 2011-07-09 19:51 |
From | Tarmo Johannes |
Subject | [Csnd] OSC device - arduino? |
Hello, for hardware control and OSC - wouldn't it make sense to use an arduino controller (http://www.arduino.cc/ ) - it is relatively cheap and you can attach a number of sliders and buttons to it and write a small interface that sends the info read from the device as OSC messages wherever you need. I have actually no experience with it but has anybody used arduino in music making? greetings, tarmo On Saturday 09 July 2011 17:43:13 Brian Wong wrote: > > As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that is just me. > Brian Wong > > > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > > From: samuelsagan@gmail.com > > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > > Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > > > MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-09 19:55 |
From | Adam Puckett |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OSC device - arduino? |
Jacob Joaquin has blogged about it on http://csoundblog.com/. On 7/9/11, Tarmo Johannes |
Date | 2011-07-09 20:52 |
From | thorin kerr |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
Realtime, I live-code using python in Emacs. Thorin On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Arthur Pirika <arfy32@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, what method of input do most people use for getting music out of cSound? Does anyone still use the traditional score file? Do most use midi? or do most use some other form of composing? I'd use nGen, but that seems to be hard to get, though I do have a copy. So what other music input languages work well with csound? |
Date | 2011-07-09 21:09 |
From | Martin Peach |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OSC device - arduino? |
Here's an example of arduino sending OSC: http://www.adrianfreed.com/content/oscuino-arduino-osc-sketch-open-sound-control-work I'm not sure if csound can receive on a serial port, though. You might have to go via Pd or Max. Martin On 2011-07-09 14:51, Tarmo Johannes wrote: > Hello, > for hardware control and OSC - wouldn't it make sense to use an arduino controller (http://www.arduino.cc/ ) - it is relatively cheap and you can attach a number of sliders and buttons to it and write a small interface that sends the info read from the device as OSC messages wherever you need. > > I have actually no experience with it but has anybody used arduino in music making? > > greetings, > tarmo > > On Saturday 09 July 2011 17:43:13 Brian Wong wrote: >> >> As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that is just me. >> Brian Wong >> >>> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 >>> From: samuelsagan@gmail.com >>> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk >>> Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use >>> >>> MIDI keyboards and nothing else. >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html >>> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker >>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 >>> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here >>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" >>> >> >> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 >> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here >> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" >> >> > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-09 22:14 |
From | Brian Redfern |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
I've also found two articles from the csound journal to be really helpful. I wrote a couple on midi and microtuning live midi performance. But the ones I've gotten a lot out of lately are the one from the latest version on using looping within scores and one a couple issues back on using dseq. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-09 22:17 |
From | Brian Redfern |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
Also there's this really good open source project for using OSC on multiple kinds of mobile devices: https://github.com/charlieroberts/Control On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Brian Redfern |
Date | 2011-07-10 09:38 |
From | zappfinger |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: OSC device - arduino? |
When using OSC with Arduino, I find it most easy to write a small python program that accepts the serial input from Arduino and convert it to OSC messages. So basically: Arduino -> serial -> python prog -> OSC -> csound Richard -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4569966.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-10 13:31 |
From | Stéphane Rollandin |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
> Maybe if people stopped dumping money, time, and effort into obsolete > tech I use MIDI all the time. Very limited but also very useful, well supported everywhere; I don't see it on the way out anytime soon. It's a standard, which OSC is not. My 2 cents, Stef Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-10 14:59 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Re: OSC device - arduino? |
One could always write an OSC firmware for the arduino thus illuminating the need to convert anything. On 10 July 2011 09:38, zappfinger |
Date | 2011-07-10 16:21 |
From | Brian Wong |
Subject | RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
You are probably right about MIDI not going away anytime soon, unfortunately. I agree about MIDI being a standard, which is why I notified the list about the Eigenlabs white paper on OSC, which hopefully is a step in the direction of making OSC more of a standard. I really don't want to debate this, I am very well aware of the ubiquitious market penetration of MIDI technology among electronic musicians, and once upon a time had a whole studio full of MIDI gear myself. Want to buy a MIDI controller keyboard with one broken key? I'll let it go for 2 cents (shipping costs not included). Brian > Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:31:06 +0200 > From: lecteur@zogotounga.net > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > > Maybe if people stopped dumping money, time, and effort into obsolete > > tech > > I use MIDI all the time. Very limited but also very useful, well > supported everywhere; I don't see it on the way out anytime soon. It's a > standard, which OSC is not. > > My 2 cents, > > Stef > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-10 20:22 |
From | Louis Cohen |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use |
For fixed compositions I use a Java app that I wrote, which uses techniques akin to granular synthesis. This app generates scores, typically with thousands of score lines. For some fixed compositions my orchestra instruments generate the "events", using algorithms typically driven by control signals generated by other orchestra instruments. Sometimes I use a MIDI keyboard controller along with Csound or Logic +soft-sampler to generate short sequences of sounds which are turned into audio files. These files are used as sound source material for fixed compositions. At the moment I'm also hand-editing these MIDI sequences in preparation for creating my source files. For real time improvisation I use a wiimote and Nunchuk pair, which, via Osculator, generates OSC messages. These are interpreted by my orchestra instruments in various ways: some wiimote button presses start notes, and button releases end notes. Some button presses start sequences of notes, the characteristics of which are determined by the orientation of the wiimote/nunchuk. -Lou On Jul 9, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Samuel Sagan wrote: > MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > > -- > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2011-07-11 02:28 |
From | Michael Bechard |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods most people use] |
On the subject of the Eigenharp, I've been recently lusting after it, but I am turned off by the "requirement" of a Mac (and the price, not gonna bother with the Pico). Do you own a Mac? Have you been able to use it yet against, say, the CSound API? Which Eigenharp did you buy? Are you satisfied with your purchase? (sorry about the number of questions!) Thanks, Michael Bechard From: Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Sat, July 9, 2011 9:43:13 AM Subject: RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use
As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that is just me. Brian Wong
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > From: samuelsagan@gmail.co m > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > > -- > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-11 02:33 |
From | Michael Bechard |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] Musical input methods most people use |
blue, and occasionally MIDI. But mostly blue. Michael Bechard http://soundcloud.com/wodgod/sets ----- Original Message ---- From: Arthur Pirika |
Date | 2011-07-11 03:37 |
From | Brian Wong |
Subject | RE: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods |
There is now a version for Windows 7 for all three models I believe, though I am not sure they are considered fully stable yet. At the moment I only have the Pico, which has uses in a recording context, but is quite limited for live applications. Frankly I have barely had any time to look at or use it much except for bringing it to a few jams and doing a few tutorials and poking around in the source code and Belcanto language a bit. Nonetheless I am very satisfied with my purchase. Having ten times better velocity sensitivity is something that is immediate and obvious. Individual bidirectional string bend polyphonically per key is just plain awesome compare to midi. But skipping the Pico and going straight to the Tau or Alpha is what I would recommend. I got the Pico because I am gruesomely poor and just hoping to learn the software in the years it will take me to save up for the Alpha (assuming such a unlikely miracle actually ever occurs before I die). My programming skills are just too weak to even attempt the Csound API at this point. However I can clearly already see that I will need to get considerably competent with both C++ and Python to achieve my goals - realtime play + realtime interactive algorithmic. But the fact that the software is Open Source at least provides the possible option of modifying and extending it. The work Michael Gogins is currently doing with embedding Csound orchestras into C++ and C++ based algorithmic music looks interesting and possibly relevant. At this point I am still figuring out how to get G++ and Python working on my MacBook Pro. And what I need to use this Firewire port.... There is a synth development language (graphical programming MaxMsp/PD style) called Workbench coming out "soon" for the Eigenharp and if I can afford it I will be checking that out, although I am not sure if it will actually work with the Pico. I am involved in another non-electronic collaborative project at the moment, but hope to start spending a lot more time with the Eigenharp soon. Summary - If you have the money, get one. The included SF2 files are quite few but very good, and the physical models of the cello and particularly the clarinet are top notch. Xentonal tunings are totally simple to achieve, and the ability to map the keys to whatever notes and pitchbend ranges you want is wonderful. Brian Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:28:46 -0700 From: gothmagog@yahoo.com To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Subject: Re: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods most people use] On the subject of the Eigenharp, I've been recently lusting after it, but I am turned off by the "requirement" of a Mac (and the price, not gonna bother with the Pico). Do you own a Mac? Have you been able to use it yet against, say, the CSound API? Which Eigenharp did you buy? Are you satisfied with your purchase? (sorry about the number of questions!) Thanks, Michael Bechard From: Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Sat, July 9, 2011 9:43:13 AM Subject: RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use
As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that is just me.
Brian Wong > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > From: samuelsagan@gmail.com > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > > -- > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-11 18:57 |
From | Michael Bechard |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods |
Cool, thanks for the info Brian. One last question: last I checked, Linux wasn't supported. Is this still the case, and do they have any plans on supporting it in the future? Thanks, Michael Bechard http://www.soundcloud.com/wodgod/sets From: Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.co m> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Sun, July 10, 2011 9:37:25 PM Subject: RE: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods
There is now a version for Windows 7 for all three models I believe, though I am not sure they are considered fully stable yet. At the moment I only have the Pico, which has uses in a recording context, but is quite limited for live applications. Frankly I have barely had any time to look at or use it much except for bringing it to a few jams and doing a few tutorials and poking around in the source code and Belcanto language a bit. Nonetheless I am very satisfied with my purchase. Having ten times better velocity sensitivity is something that is immediate and obvious. Individual bidirectional string bend polyphonically per key is just plain awesome compare to midi.
But skipping the Pico and going straight to the Tau or Alpha is what I would recommend. I got the Pico because I am gruesomely poor and just hoping to learn the
software in the years it will take me to save up for the Alpha (assuming such a unlikely miracle actually ever occurs before I die).
My programming skills are just too weak to even attempt the Csound API at this point. However I can clearly already see that I will need to get considerably competent with both C++ and Python to achieve my goals - realtime play + realtime interactive algorithmic. But the fact that the software is Open Source at least provides the possible option of modifying and extending it. The work Michael Gogins is currently doing with embedding Csound orchestras into C++ and C++ based algorithmic music looks interesting and possibly relevant. At this point I am still figurin
g out how to get G++ and Python working on my MacBook Pro. And what I need to use this Firewire port.... There is a synth development language (graphical programming MaxMsp/PD style) called Workbench coming out "soon" for the Eigenharp and if I can afford it I will be checking that out, although I am not sure if it will actually work with the Pico. I am involved in another non-electronic collaborative project at the moment, but hope to start spending a lot more time with the Eigenharp soon. Summary - If you have the money, get one. The included SF2 files are quite few but very good, and the physical models of the cello and particularly the clarinet are top notch. Xentonal tunings are totally simple to achieve, and the ability to map the keys to whatever
notes and pitchbend ranges you want is wonderful. Brian Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:28:46 -0700 From: gothmagog@yahoo.com To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Subject: Re: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods most people use] On the subject of the Eigenharp, I've been recently lusting after it, but I am turned off by the "requirement" of a Mac (and the price, not gonna bother with the Pico). Do you own a Mac? Have you been able to use it yet against, say, the CSound API? Which Eigenharp did you buy? Are you satisfied with your purchase? (sorry about the number of questions!) Thanks, Michael Bechard From: Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> < b>To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Sat, July 9, 2011 9:43:13 AM Subject: RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use
As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that is just me.
Brian Wong > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > From: samuelsagan@gmail.co m > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > > -- > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-11 19:52 |
From | Brian Wong |
Subject | RE: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods |
Linux is still unsupported officially as far as I know, but there is definitely a Linux person or two working on a port. Check out the following thread for example : Brian Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:57:57 -0700 From: gothmagog@yahoo.com To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Subject: Re: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods Cool, thanks for the info Brian. One last question: last I checked, Linux wasn't supported. Is this still the case, and do they have any plans on supporting it in the future? Thanks, Michael Bechard http://www.soundcloud.com/wodgod/sets From: Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Sun, July 10, 2011 9:37:25 PM Subject: RE: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods
There is now a version for Windows 7 for all three models I believe, though I am not sure they are considered fully stable yet. At the moment I only have the Pico, which has uses in a recording context, but is quite limited for live applications. Frankly I have barely had any time to look at or use it much except for bringing it to a few jams and doing a few tutorials and poking around in the source code and Belcanto language a bit. Nonetheless I am very satisfied with my purchase. Having ten times better velocity sensitivity is something that is immediate and obvious. Individual bidirectional string bend polyphonically per key is just plain awesome compare to midi. But skipping the Pico and going straight to the Tau or Alpha is what I would recommend. I got the Pico because I am gruesomely poor and just hoping to learn the
software in the years it will take me to save up for the Alpha (assuming such a unlikely miracle actually ever occurs before I die).
My programming skills are just too weak to even attempt the Csound API at this point. However I can clearly already see that I will need to get considerably competent with both C++ and Python to achieve my goals - realtime play + realtime interactive algorithmic. But the fact that the software is Open Source at least provides the possible option of modifying and extending it. The work Michael Gogins is currently doing with embedding Csound orchestras into C++ and C++ based algorithmic music looks interesting and possibly relevant. At this point I am still figuring out how to get G++ and Python working on my MacBook Pro. And what I need to use this Firewire port.... There is a synth development language (graphical programming MaxMsp/PD style) called Workbench coming out "soon" for the Eigenharp and if I can afford it I will be checking that out, although I am not sure if it will actually work with the Pico. I am involved in another non-electronic collaborative project at the moment, but hope to start spending a lot more time with the Eigenharp soon. Summary - If you have the money, get one. The included SF2 files are quite few but very good, and the physical models of the cello and particularly the clarinet are top notch. Xentonal tunings are totally simple to achieve, and the ability to map the keys to whatever notes and pitchbend ranges you want is wonderful. Brian Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:28:46 -0700 From: gothmagog@yahoo.com To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Subject: Re: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods most people use] On the subject of the Eigenharp, I've been recently lusting after it, but I am turned off by the "requirement" of a Mac (and the price, not gonna bother with the Pico). Do you own a Mac? Have you been able to use it yet against, say, the CSound API? Which Eigenharp did you buy? Are you satisfied with your purchase? (sorry about the number of questions!) Thanks, Michael Bechard From: Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Sat, July 9, 2011 9:43:13 AM Subject: RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use
As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that is just me.
Brian Wong > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > From: samuelsagan@gmail.com > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > > -- > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |
Date | 2011-07-11 21:30 |
From | Brian Wong |
Subject | RE: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods |
Just thought I would note, particularly for Andreas, the other new Mac user, that I successfully installed Xcode and Aquamacs, and it was a total breeze. - BW
From: brian.wong1@hotmail.com To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:37:25 -0300 Subject: RE: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods
There is now a version for Windows 7 for all three models I believe, though I am not sure they are considered fully stable yet. At the moment I only have the Pico, which has uses in a recording context, but is quite limited for live applications. Frankly I have barely had any time to look at or use it much except for bringing it to a few jams and doing a few tutorials and poking around in the source code and Belcanto language a bit. Nonetheless I am very satisfied with my purchase. Having ten times better velocity sensitivity is something that is immediate and obvious. Individual bidirectional string bend polyphonically per key is just plain awesome compare to midi. But skipping the Pico and going straight to the Tau or Alpha is what I would recommend. I got the Pico because I am gruesomely poor and just hoping to learn the software in the years it will take me to save up for the Alpha (assuming such a unlikely miracle actually ever occurs before I die). My programming skills are just too weak to even attempt the Csound API at this point. However I can clearly already see that I will need to get considerably competent with both C++ and Python to achieve my goals - realtime play + realtime interactive algorithmic. But the fact that the software is Open Source at least provides the possible option of modifying and extending it. The work Michael Gogins is currently doing with embedding Csound orchestras into C++ and C++ based algorithmic music looks interesting and possibly relevant. At this point I am still figuring out how to get G++ and Python working on my MacBook Pro. And what I need to use this Firewire port.... There is a synth development language (graphical programming MaxMsp/PD style) called Workbench coming out "soon" for the Eigenharp and if I can afford it I will be checking that out, although I am not sure if it will actually work with the Pico. I am involved in another non-electronic collaborative project at the moment, but hope to start spending a lot more time with the Eigenharp soon. Summary - If you have the money, get one. The included SF2 files are quite few but very good, and the physical models of the cello and particularly the clarinet are top notch. Xentonal tunings are totally simple to achieve, and the ability to map the keys to whatever notes and pitchbend ranges you want is wonderful. Brian Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:28:46 -0700 From: gothmagog@yahoo.com To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Subject: Re: [Csnd] CSound And Eigenharp [WAS: Re: Musical input methods most people use] On the subject of the Eigenharp, I've been recently lusting after it, but I am turned off by the "requirement" of a Mac (and the price, not gonna bother with the Pico). Do you own a Mac? Have you been able to use it yet against, say, the CSound API? Which Eigenharp did you buy? Are you satisfied with your purchase? (sorry about the number of questions!) Thanks, Michael Bechard From: Brian Wong <brian.wong1@hotmail.com> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Sat, July 9, 2011 9:43:13 AM Subject: RE: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use
As the OP (original poster) can see, lots of different methods are used with Csound. That is one of the nice things about the simple text-based score language; there are lots of ways to generate text. Myself, I use blue, a Csound front-end written and maintained by Steven Yi. blue has a version of Jython (Java Python) built in, as well as many very useful tools. For realtime people most people use either MIDI or more recently sometimes OSC. I personally consider MIDI unsatisfactory obsolete technology that is on the way out (FINALLY!!!!!), which is why I bought an Eigenharp and hope to eventually incorporate Csound with EigenD for realtime performance. But that is just me.
Brian Wong > Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:20:33 -0700 > From: samuelsagan@gmail.com > To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk > Subject: [Csnd] Re: Musical input methods most people use > > MIDI keyboards and nothing else. > > -- > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Musical-input-methods-most-people-use-tp4567362p4568170.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > |