[Csnd] krate stupid question
Date | 2012-04-11 11:46 |
From | francesco |
Subject | [Csnd] krate stupid question |
Hello All, apologies for this really stupid question but it's my daily curiosity ... If i have a csd that doesn't use k-rate variables can i use a low value for k-rate (i.e. 1) without influencing the resulting performance? I guess that k-rate has some influence but am i right? How k-rate influence the compilation apart for k-rate variables? Thanks, ciao, francesco. -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/krate-stupid-question-tp5632438p5632438.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Date | 2012-04-11 11:55 |
From | jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] krate stupid question |
krate does not juts affect k variables. a varaiables are vectors on ksmps and various opcodes only update internal parameters once per k cycle. A k-rate of 1 woul dmean the audio vectors would be 44100 (say) samples long. It does depend on the opcodes you are using. Also notes star/end quantised to the kcycle, so you could only have events starting/finishing on a second boundary -- may be what you want.... > Hello All, > apologies for this really stupid question but it's my daily curiosity ... > If i have a csd that doesn't use k-rate variables can i use a low value > for k-rate (i.e. 1) without influencing the resulting performance? > > I guess that k-rate has some influence but am i right? > How k-rate influence the compilation apart for k-rate variables? > > Thanks, > ciao, > francesco. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/krate-stupid-question-tp5632438p5632438.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe > csound" > > > > |
Date | 2012-04-11 12:01 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] krate stupid question |
It will affect timing of events. As these happen at k-rate boundaries, and latency too. Victor On 11 Apr 2012, at 11:46, francesco wrote: > Hello All, > apologies for this really stupid question but it's my daily curiosity ... > If i have a csd that doesn't use k-rate variables can i use a low value > for k-rate (i.e. 1) without influencing the resulting performance? > > I guess that k-rate has some influence but am i right? > How k-rate influence the compilation apart for k-rate variables? > > Thanks, > ciao, > francesco. > > > -- > View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/krate-stupid-question-tp5632438p5632438.html > Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" > Dr Victor Lazzarini Senior Lecturer Dept. of Music NUI Maynooth Ireland tel.: +353 1 708 3545 Victor dot Lazzarini AT nuim dot ie |
Date | 2012-04-11 12:07 |
From | francesco |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: krate stupid question |
Yes, thanks, beautiful! I have a little arpeggio (6 notes in 2 sec) and just discovered that with kr=sr i will have 2 chords. For a low level users like me Csound is a daily surprise also due to my low memory ... PS: i had a previously message about k-rate and audio in, where audio in quality is influenced by k-rate (only with ksmps=1 i have good audio); i guess is for same reasons You explained, right? Thank You, ciao, francesco. -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/krate-stupid-question-tp5632438p5632490.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Date | 2012-04-11 13:22 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] krate stupid question |
It will definitely slow down with ksmps of 1. I find that performance is good with ksmps of about 15 our more. Still, ksmps of 1 will probably sound better because envelopes and cutoffs will be more precise. On Apr 11, 2012 6:47 AM, "francesco" <ilterzouomo@fastwebnet.it> wrote:
Hello All, |