[Csnd] dcblock/dcblock2
| Date | 2010-09-28 13:44 |
| From | Iain McCurdy |
| Subject | [Csnd] dcblock/dcblock2 |
|
dcblock2 is described as a more effective dc filter than dcblock but the test below seems to contradict this. Is there any reason for this? Thanks, Iain. <CsoundSynthesizer> <CsOptions> -odcblock.wav </CsOptions> <CsInstruments> sr = 44100 ksmps = 10 nchnls = 1 0dbfs = 1 instr 1 a1 pinkish 0.2 a1 streson a1,60,0.95 a1 dcblock a1 out a1 endin instr 2 a1 pinkish 0.2 a1 streson a1,60,0.95 a1 dcblock2 a1 out a1 endin </CsInstruments> <CsScore> i 1 0 10;dcblock i 2 10 10;dcblock2 e </CsScore> </CsoundSynthesizer> |
| Date | 2010-09-28 13:56 |
| From | Victor Lazzarini |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: dcblock/dcblock2 |
| Not sure, the two outputs look correct to me. Now, I know there was a bug with dcblock2 which I spotted sometime I don't remember when, but I fixed it. Maybe that is the difference? I am using a newish CVS build. Victor On 28 Sep 2010, at 13:44, Iain McCurdy wrote:
|
| Date | 2010-09-28 14:49 |
| From | Iain McCurdy |
| Subject | [Csnd] RE: Re: dcblock/dcblock2 |
| Attachments | dcblockdcblock2.jpg |
Thanks Victor. It seems to be a Windows thing. As you mentioned, output looks fine on Mac. Attached is the output on windows ver 5.12 doubles prebuilt.
I.
________________________________
> From: Victor.Lazzarini@nuim.ie
> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:56:11 +0100
> Subject: [Csnd] Re: dcblock/dcblock2
>
> Not sure, the two outputs look correct to me. Now, I know there was a
> bug with dcblock2 which I spotted sometime I don't remember when, but I
> fixed it.
> Maybe that is the difference? I am using a newish CVS build.
>
> Victor
>
>
> On 28 Sep 2010, at 13:44, Iain McCurdy wrote:
>
> dcblock2 is described as a more effective dc filter than dcblock but
> the test below seems to contradict this. Is there any reason for this?
> Thanks, Iain.
>
>
>
>
> -odcblock.wav
>
>
>
>
> sr = 44100
> ksmps = 10
> nchnls = 1
> 0dbfs = 1
>
> instr 1
> a1 pinkish 0.2
> a1 streson a1,60,0.95
> a1 dcblock a1
> out a1
> endin
>
> instr 2
> a1 pinkish 0.2
> a1 streson a1,60,0.95
> a1 dcblock2 a1
> out a1
> endin
>
>
>
> i 1 0 10;dcblock
> i 2 10 10;dcblock2
> e
>
>
>
>
Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
|
| Date | 2010-09-28 15:03 |
| From | Victor Lazzarini |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: RE: Re: dcblock/dcblock2 |
Maybe it's been fixed post-5.12. Victor On 28 Sep 2010, at 14:49, Iain McCurdy wrote: > > Thanks Victor. It seems to be a Windows thing. As you mentioned, > output looks fine on Mac. Attached is the output on windows ver 5.12 > doubles prebuilt. > I. > > ________________________________ >> From: Victor.Lazzarini@nuim.ie >> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk >> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:56:11 +0100 >> Subject: [Csnd] Re: dcblock/dcblock2 >> >> Not sure, the two outputs look correct to me. Now, I know there was a >> bug with dcblock2 which I spotted sometime I don't remember when, >> but I >> fixed it. >> Maybe that is the difference? I am using a newish CVS build. >> >> Victor >> >> >> On 28 Sep 2010, at 13:44, Iain McCurdy wrote: >> >> dcblock2 is described as a more effective dc filter than dcblock but >> the test below seems to contradict this. Is there any reason for >> this? >> Thanks, Iain. >> >> >> >> >> -odcblock.wav >> >> >> >> >> sr = 44100 >> ksmps = 10 >> nchnls = 1 >> 0dbfs = 1 >> >> instr 1 >> a1 pinkish 0.2 >> a1 streson a1,60,0.95 >> a1 dcblock a1 >> out a1 >> endin >> >> instr 2 >> a1 pinkish 0.2 >> a1 streson a1,60,0.95 >> a1 dcblock2 a1 >> out a1 >> endin >> >> >> >> i 1 0 10;dcblock >> i 2 10 10;dcblock2 >> e >> >> >> >> > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" > > |