Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

Re: [Csnd] Re: Would anyone be interested in this 18 DoF motion

Date2011-10-09 21:24
From"Partev Barr Sarkissian"
SubjectRe: [Csnd] Re: Would anyone be interested in this 18 DoF motion
[sorry,... here's typo correct version]

--- encino_man@netscape.com wrote:

From: "Partev Barr Sarkissian" 
To: 
Subject: Re: [Csnd] Re: Would anyone be interested in this 18 DoF motion
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:06:16 -0700

To eliminate "zipper noise", the typical way to deal with it is to
run the signal through a low-pass filter with the cut-off frequency 
set low. This allows better response without the noise creeping in. 
This works with changing levels of audio, such as the early automated 
mix with VCA controlled MCI mixing consoles, or joystick remote cotrols 
for Focus, f-Stop and Zoom controls on a lens system for a Panavision 
70mm movie camera.


-Partev


=============================================================


--- mantaraya36@gmail.com wrote:

From: Andres Cabrera 
To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [Csnd] Re: Would anyone be interested in this 18 DoF motion
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:52:01 +0100

Hi,

Is the controller transmitting at 100Hz, or is the OSC birdge
trnsmitting at 100Hz? In any case, 100Hz is way too much for certain
control envelopes, so you will indeed need some kind of interpolation
between values.

Cheers,
Andres

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:20 AM, MrMormon  wrote:
> Well, it doesn't hurt.
>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> sr=48000
> ksmps=480
> instr 1
> iin OSCinit 7022
> krx init 0
> kry init 0
> kof OSClisten iin,"/sixense/hydra/0/controller/left/position/x","f",krx
> kof OSClisten iin,"/sixense/hydra/0/controller/left/position/y","f",kry
> krx port krx,.02
> kry port kry,.02
> aud oscil 0dbfs/20,2^((abs(krx)+1300)/200),1
> au2 oscil 0dbfs/20,2^((abs(kry)+1300)/200),1
> out aud
> out au2
> endin
> 
> 
> f 1 0 16384 10 1
> i 1 0 999
> 
> 
>
> Even with just one pitch, no port value gets rid of zippering without
> creating serious lag. Are my sr and ksmps wrong for a 100 Hz controller? If
> my shouldn't cause that, Sixense's OSC program has to be the source of lag.
> Besides, I'd prefer a logarithmic interpolation between successive data
> values instead of port...
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Would-anyone-be-interested-in-this-18-DoF-motion-control-interface-tp4863871p4884021.html
> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
>            https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
>
>


Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
            https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"





_____________________________________________________________
Netscape.  Just the Net You Need.
Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
            https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"





_____________________________________________________________
Netscape.  Just the Net You Need.
Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
            https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"