[Csnd] OSCsend trigger from partikkel internal clock
Date | 2013-03-30 19:30 |
From | Zilatili |
Subject | [Csnd] OSCsend trigger from partikkel internal clock |
Hello, I'm new to Csound and I hope someone would help me to find a way to access the trigger output of partikkel in internal clock mode. I know how to send OSC messages via OSCsend, but I don't know how to send the output of partikkel everytime it creates a new grain. (if playing or not). I just need the information 1 or 0 Maybe it's done with partikkelsync, but I can't figure out how... Thanks for any helps! -- View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/OSCsend-trigger-from-partikkel-internal-clock-tp5721623.html Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
Date | 2013-04-02 08:10 |
From | Oeyvind Brandtsegg |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OSCsend trigger from partikkel internal clock |
Hi, Yes, your assumtion is correct, you can do it with the partikkelsync opcode.See the manual example on http://www.csounds.com/manual/html/partikkelsync.html async1 partikkelsync iopcode_id Oeyvind 2013/3/30 Zilatili <ygdraasil@gmail.com> Hello, -- Oeyvind Brandtsegg Professor of Music Technology NTNU 7491 Trondheim Norway Cell: +47 92 203 205 http://flyndresang.no/ http://www.partikkelaudio.com/ http://soundcloud.com/brandtsegg http://soundcloud.com/t-emp |
Date | 2013-04-02 10:27 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OSCsend trigger from partikkel internal clock |
I'm wondering if OSC timing is good enough for partikkelsync. I think it would be better to use Jack and output the sync 'track' as audio signal. P On 2 April 2013 08:10, Oeyvind Brandtsegg <oyvind.brandtsegg@ntnu.no> wrote:
|
Date | 2013-04-03 11:23 |
From | Zilatili |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OSCsend trigger from partikkel internal clock |
Hi,
Thanks for your help, I've managed to do it by converting the a-rate signal from the partikkelsync to a k-rate signal with the rms opcode and send it with OSCsend. Concerning timing it seems to work well like that. Thanks again. Le 02/04/13 11:27, peiman khosravi a écrit :
|