[Csnd] sample rate and bit depth conversion
| Date | 2010-03-31 14:20 |
| From | Peiman Khosravi |
| Subject | [Csnd] sample rate and bit depth conversion |
Hello,
I have a general DSP question.
I have some sounds that I need to convert from 96k/24bit to 44.1/16.
Theoretically is better to resample the sound-file first and then
change the bit depth or the other way around, or is there no difference?
Thanks in advance
Peiman
Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
|
| Date | 2010-03-31 22:35 |
| From | Erik de Castro Lopo |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: sample rate and bit depth conversion |
Peiman Khosravi wrote: > I have a general DSP question. > > I have some sounds that I need to convert from 96k/24bit to 44.1/16. > Theoretically is better to resample the sound-file first and then > change the bit depth or the other way around, or is there no difference? Resample first. Always! Bit depth reduction *always* reduces the quality (by raising the noise floor) while sample rate converters can have noise floors at 150dB below full scale and even lower. Erik |
| Date | 2010-04-01 01:23 |
| From | peiman khosravi |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: sample rate and bit depth conversion |
| Thanks very much! Best, Peiman On 31 March 2010 23:35, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la@mega-nerd.com> wrote:
|
| Date | 2010-04-01 17:59 | |
| From | mark jamerson | |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: sample rate and bit depth conversion | |
|
| Date | 2010-04-01 18:03 | |
| From | Peiman Khosravi | |
| Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: sample rate and bit depth conversion | |
| Yes Yes thanks. I always work with 24 bit. I just had to send a file over the internet for someone to audition and needed o reduce the size. Thanks again Peiman On 1 Apr 2010, at 17:59, mark jamerson wrote:
|