Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[Csnd] Re: Re: Efficient basic reverb?

Date2008-06-03 12:14
Fromkelly hirai
Subject[Csnd] Re: Re: Efficient basic reverb?
i have this tape echo, the klemt echolette, it uses 3 tape heads (delay 
lines) and creates a convincing arena type echo, like playing outside in 
the city.. the first delay has no feedback, the other 2 are fully 
connected. the tape speed is not the most stable and to my ear brings that 
defraction that you get from the air over hot pavement. high pass filter 
to simulate the reflector surface. hmm, maybe i should try this as my 
first opcode.

k.

On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, luis jure wrote:

> El Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:13:18 -0400
"Art Hunkins"  escribió:

> I do want to incorporate a depth element, however, probably via a
> (very) basic open reverb in connection with locsit and locsend.
> 
> Which is the most basic and efficient reverb for this purpose?

freeverb?


Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"

Date2008-06-03 18:13
From"Art Hunkins"
Subject[Csnd] Efficient basic reverb?
I'm doing a realtime Csound piece that must run on the OLPC. Thus it is 
limited to stereo and cannot use the Ambisonic opcodes (too bad).

I do want to incorporate a depth element, however, probably via a (very) 
basic open reverb in connection with locsit and locsend.

Which is the most basic and efficient reverb for this purpose? (All I want 
is basic depth perception, variable in real time - to give the impression of 
3D panning.)

Art Hunkins 


Date2008-06-03 19:02
Fromluis jure
Subject[Csnd] Re: Efficient basic reverb?
El Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:13:18 -0400
"Art Hunkins"  escribió:

> I do want to incorporate a depth element, however, probably via a
> (very) basic open reverb in connection with locsit and locsend.
> 
> Which is the most basic and efficient reverb for this purpose?

freeverb?