0.0000 may not be enough significant digits to record the time, try printf.

Regards,
Mike

-----Original Message-----
>From: Jacob Joaquin 
>Sent: Jun 5, 2008 2:49 PM
>To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
>Subject: [Csnd] Re: Re: Performance differences between globals, zak, and chn.
>
>
>I fiddled around with the clock stuff yesterday for about 20 minutes, and all
>I could get out of it was 0.0000.  Not sure if it was me, or if there is a
>potential bug.  When I get a chance, I'll spend more time with it, because
>if it's me that's broken, then I should really get it working as it will be
>a great tool.  Alternatively, if there is a bug, then it should be reported.
>
>In the meantime, I did come up with working solution using rtclock.
>
>Best,
>Jake
>
>
>jpff-2 wrote:
>> 
>> The clockon/clockoff opcodes were invented for exactly this kind of
>> question
>> 
>
>-- 
>View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-differences-between-globals%2C-zak%2C-and-chn.-tp17650134p17677040.html
>Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>Send bugs reports to this list.
>To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"