The code for Csound 5.18 has been fixed, and we are just cleaning up,
checking manual etc.  The intent is to release this version on
Wednesday this week; packages should follow shortly afterwards.

5.18 has the usual bug fixes, new opcodes, new options, improved speed
(minor) and internal improvements.

==John ffitch

Hello John,

the files example/readf.csd, example/readfi.csd, 
examples-xml/readf.csd.xml, and examples-xml/readfi.csd.xml are missing 
in git/manual. When the manual is complete, I'll build the different 
packages as usual.

Regards

Francois

Le 27/08/2012 10:59, john ffitch a écrit :
> The code for Csound 5.18 has been fixed, and we are just cleaning up,
> checking manual etc.  The intent is to release this version on
> Wednesday this week; packages should follow shortly afterwards.
>
> 5.18 has the usual bug fixes, new opcodes, new options, improved speed
> (minor) and internal improvements.
>
> ==John ffitch
>
>
> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
>              https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
>

> Hello John,
>
> the files example/readf.csd, example/readfi.csd,
> examples-xml/readf.csd.xml, and examples-xml/readfi.csd.xml are missing
> in git/manual. When the manual is complete, I'll build the different
> packages as usual.
>
> Regards
>
> Francois
>

Yes, I knew.  Placeholders there now.  Really more musical examples are
needed like printing words of a song...

==John ff

Hi,

Unfortunately, I won't have time to make a proper release of CsoundQt,
so one of the exisitng binaries will have to be bundled. The 0.6
series was built for floats and the 0.7 alphas are built for doubles.
0.6 are more tried and tested, and I'm not sure it's worth bundling
two versions...

That said, building CsoundQt is fairly simple, so if someone wants to
grab the sources for the 0.6 versions and build for doubles for this
release, it would be great. Unfortunately I don't have a mac or a
windows development environment set up, so I can't do it right now...

Cheers,
Andrés

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:05 AM, peiman khosravi
 wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> Any chance you could package a double precision version of CsoundQT with the
> OS X release please? It's not essential if you haven't got the time, but it
> would be nice.
>
> Many Thanks
> Peiman
>
> On 27 August 2012 11:00, PINOT Francois  wrote:
>>
>> Hello John,
>>
>> the files example/readf.csd, example/readfi.csd,
>> examples-xml/readf.csd.xml, and examples-xml/readfi.csd.xml are missing in
>> git/manual. When the manual is complete, I'll build the different packages
>> as usual.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Francois
>>
>> Le 27/08/2012 10:59, john ffitch a écrit :
>>
>>> The code for Csound 5.18 has been fixed, and we are just cleaning up,
>>> checking manual etc.  The intent is to release this version on
>>> Wednesday this week; packages should follow shortly afterwards.
>>>
>>> 5.18 has the usual bug fixes, new opcodes, new options, improved speed
>>> (minor) and internal improvements.
>>>
>>> ==John ffitch
>>>
>>>
>>> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
>>>              https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
>>> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
>>> csound"
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
>>            https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
>> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
>> csound"
>>
>

hola

On 8/27/12, john ffitch  wrote:
> The code for Csound 5.18 has been fixed, and we are just cleaning up,
> checking manual etc.  The intent is to release this version on
> Wednesday this week; packages should follow shortly afterwards.

excellent. you and the dev team are one of the most incredible parts of csound.

is there some kinda change log or something that lists the differences
between this version and the last? i'm not trying to add to the task
list; just asking ...

it's probably one of those things that falls under "cleaning up" ...

-- 
\js [http://or8.net/~johns/] : "complete obscure contrariness"