Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[Csnd] Re: Re: Csound 5.08Beta -- Further suggestion

Date2008-03-06 18:51
Fromvictor
Subject[Csnd] Re: Re: Csound 5.08Beta -- Further suggestion
you can do it already just do
[440*2] etc

Victor
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan McConnell" 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:56 PM
Subject: [Csnd] Re: Csound 5.08Beta -- Further suggestion


> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:24:59AM +0000, jpff wrote:
>> Friends (and enemies and those indifferent)
> Oh, friends, surely!
>
>> on Sourceforge.  While this is marked as Beta, it is believed to be
>> complete.  The main point for testing is the installers.  If you are
>> adventurous, or have some of the mythical spare time, we would
>> appreciate receiving reports, both good and bad, so we can move to a
>> definitive release very soon.
> Small technical suggestion from a newbie:  the items 'p1', 'p2',
> in .orc files are the main numerical parameters to be called
> from .sco files.  Would it be possible to change the code
> slightly so that these parameters could accept not only input
> of the form   440   or  1.2   but input of the form
> 440*2 ,  1.2*1.5,  etc.  Don't we all have occasion to
> slow down the output, or speed up the output, or put something
> in a higher octave, etc?  It would IMHO make editing, and
> hence experimenting, much easier if one didn't have to change
> every parameter value "by hand", but could simply introduce
> a multiplicative factor . . .
>
> Please excuse if this suggestion is out of line!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Alan
>
> -- 
> Alan McConnell :  http://patriot.net/users/alan
>    There are many good Impeachment sites; one of the best is:
>           www.waifllc.org
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"