It is indeed very intersting, but I guess it does not have the interpolation quality of lposcil. Having said that, if the latter doesn't work... there isn't much choice, is it?

Thanks.


Marco


----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> Von: victor 
> An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 19:35:43 Uhr
> Betreff: [Csnd] Re: lposcil and phase control
> 
> Have you look at flooper2?
> 
> Victor
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa" 
> To: 
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:18 PM
> Subject: [Csnd] lposcil and phase control
> 
> 
> Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),
> 
> I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with lposcil the
> amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the second one!).
> I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not work with 
> lposcil. Is
> there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase (i.e. the
> starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred table? loscil 
> doesn't have this
> feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds of short
> files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
> Any help would be appreciated.
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> Marco
> 
> 
> 
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" 
> 
> 
> 
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"

It interpolates linearly as does lposcil, so no difference there.

lposcil3 does cubic, so it would be more precise, but
linear interpolation is fine to my ears. If there is a need for
a cubic interp flooper2, I certainly can add it.

The crossfade makes it easier to avoid clicks.

Victor
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marco Stroppa" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:09 PM
Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: lposcil and phase control



It is indeed very intersting, but I guess it does not have the interpolation 
quality of lposcil. Having said that, if the latter doesn't work... there 
isn't much choice, is it?

Thanks.


Marco


----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> Von: victor 
> An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 19:35:43 Uhr
> Betreff: [Csnd] Re: lposcil and phase control
>
> Have you look at flooper2?
>
> Victor
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:18 PM
> Subject: [Csnd] lposcil and phase control
>
>
> Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),
>
> I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with 
> lposcil the
> amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the second 
> one!).
> I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not work 
> with
> lposcil. Is
> there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase (i.e. 
> the
> starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred table? 
> loscil
> doesn't have this
> feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds of 
> short
> files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
> Any help would be appreciated.
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Marco
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"






Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
csound"=