Yes, sorry, I meant the "lopscil" family.


Marco


----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> Von: victor 
> An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 21:37:27 Uhr
> Betreff: [Csnd] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
> 
> But lposcil does not do cubic interpolation, but linear. You need lposcil3
> for that.
> 
> Victor
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa" 
> To: 
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:49 PM
> Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
> 
> 
> 
> Well, when the transposition is very low, the interpolation does make a 
> difference. At "normal" rates, it is not audible (but who wants to be 
> normal...?...;-)
> 
> Anyway, also for consistency with lposcil, I guess that a cubic interpolation 
> would be definitely useful. No hurry, though!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Marco
> 
> 
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> > Von: victor 
> > An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> > Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 20:23:47 Uhr
> > Betreff: [Csnd] Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
> > 
> > It interpolates linearly as does lposcil, so no difference there.
> > 
> > lposcil3 does cubic, so it would be more precise, but
> > linear interpolation is fine to my ears. If there is a need for
> > a cubic interp flooper2, I certainly can add it.
> > 
> > The crossfade makes it easier to avoid clicks.
> > 
> > Victor
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:09 PM
> > Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > It is indeed very intersting, but I guess it does not have the interpolation
> > quality of lposcil. Having said that, if the latter doesn't work... there 
> isn't
> > much choice, is it?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > 
> > Marco
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> > > Von: victor
> > > An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> > > Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 19:35:43 Uhr
> > > Betreff: [Csnd] Re: lposcil and phase control
> > >
> > > Have you look at flooper2?
> > >
> > > Victor
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:18 PM
> > > Subject: [Csnd] lposcil and phase control
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),
> > >
> > > I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with > 
> lposcil
> > the
> > > amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the second
> > one!).
> > > I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not work > 
> with
> > > lposcil. Is
> > > there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase > (i.e. 
> the
> > > starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred table? > 
> loscil
> > > doesn't have this
> > > feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds of > 
> short
> > > files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
> > > Any help would be appreciated.
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > >
> > > Marco
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> > csound"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> > csound"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> > csound"=
> > 
> > 
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"= 
> 
> 
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"

I will try to add in a cubic interp flooper3 (probably an extra
option to it).
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marco Stroppa" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 7:20 AM
Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control



Yes, sorry, I meant the "lopscil" family.


Marco


----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> Von: victor 
> An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 21:37:27 Uhr
> Betreff: [Csnd] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
>
> But lposcil does not do cubic interpolation, but linear. You need lposcil3
> for that.
>
> Victor
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:49 PM
> Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
>
>
>
> Well, when the transposition is very low, the interpolation does make a
> difference. At "normal" rates, it is not audible (but who wants to be
> normal...?...;-)
>
> Anyway, also for consistency with lposcil, I guess that a cubic 
> interpolation
> would be definitely useful. No hurry, though!
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Marco
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> > Von: victor
> > An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> > Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 20:23:47 Uhr
> > Betreff: [Csnd] Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
> >
> > It interpolates linearly as does lposcil, so no difference there.
> >
> > lposcil3 does cubic, so it would be more precise, but
> > linear interpolation is fine to my ears. If there is a need for
> > a cubic interp flooper2, I certainly can add it.
> >
> > The crossfade makes it easier to avoid clicks.
> >
> > Victor
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:09 PM
> > Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
> >
> >
> >
> > It is indeed very intersting, but I guess it does not have the 
> > interpolation
> > quality of lposcil. Having said that, if the latter doesn't work... 
> > there
> isn't
> > much choice, is it?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Marco
> >
> >
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> > > Von: victor
> > > An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> > > Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 19:35:43 Uhr
> > > Betreff: [Csnd] Re: lposcil and phase control
> > >
> > > Have you look at flooper2?
> > >
> > > Victor
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:18 PM
> > > Subject: [Csnd] lposcil and phase control
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),
> > >
> > > I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with >
> lposcil
> > the
> > > amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the 
> > > second
> > one!).
> > > I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not 
> > > work >
> with
> > > lposcil. Is
> > > there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase > 
> > > (i.e.
> the
> > > starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred table? 
> > >  >
> loscil
> > > doesn't have this
> > > feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds of 
> > >  >
> short
> > > files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
> > > Any help would be appreciated.
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > >
> > > Marco
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body 
> > > "unsubscribe
> > csound"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body 
> > > "unsubscribe
> > csound"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> > csound"=
> >
> >
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"=
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"






Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
csound"=