Well, when the transposition is very low, the interpolation does make a difference. At "normal" rates, it is not audible (but who wants to be normal...?...;-)

Anyway, also for consistency with lposcil, I guess that a cubic interpolation would be definitely useful. No hurry, though!

Cheers,


Marco


----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> Von: victor 
> An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 20:23:47 Uhr
> Betreff: [Csnd] Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
> 
> It interpolates linearly as does lposcil, so no difference there.
> 
> lposcil3 does cubic, so it would be more precise, but
> linear interpolation is fine to my ears. If there is a need for
> a cubic interp flooper2, I certainly can add it.
> 
> The crossfade makes it easier to avoid clicks.
> 
> Victor
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa" 
> To: 
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:09 PM
> Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
> 
> 
> 
> It is indeed very intersting, but I guess it does not have the interpolation 
> quality of lposcil. Having said that, if the latter doesn't work... there isn't 
> much choice, is it?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Marco
> 
> 
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> > Von: victor 
> > An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> > Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 19:35:43 Uhr
> > Betreff: [Csnd] Re: lposcil and phase control
> > 
> > Have you look at flooper2?
> > 
> > Victor
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:18 PM
> > Subject: [Csnd] lposcil and phase control
> > 
> > 
> > Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),
> > 
> > I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with lposcil 
> the
> > amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the second 
> one!).
> > I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not work with
> > lposcil. Is
> > there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase (i.e. the
> > starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred table? loscil
> > doesn't have this
> > feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds of short
> > files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
> > Any help would be appreciated.
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > 
> > Marco
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"= 
> 
> 
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"

But lposcil does not do cubic interpolation, but linear. You need lposcil3
for that.

Victor
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marco Stroppa" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:49 PM
Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control



Well, when the transposition is very low, the interpolation does make a 
difference. At "normal" rates, it is not audible (but who wants to be 
normal...?...;-)

Anyway, also for consistency with lposcil, I guess that a cubic 
interpolation would be definitely useful. No hurry, though!

Cheers,


Marco


----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> Von: victor 
> An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 20:23:47 Uhr
> Betreff: [Csnd] Re: AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
>
> It interpolates linearly as does lposcil, so no difference there.
>
> lposcil3 does cubic, so it would be more precise, but
> linear interpolation is fine to my ears. If there is a need for
> a cubic interp flooper2, I certainly can add it.
>
> The crossfade makes it easier to avoid clicks.
>
> Victor
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 7:09 PM
> Subject: [Csnd] AW: Re: lposcil and phase control
>
>
>
> It is indeed very intersting, but I guess it does not have the 
> interpolation
> quality of lposcil. Having said that, if the latter doesn't work... there 
> isn't
> much choice, is it?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Marco
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
> > Von: victor
> > An: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk
> > Gesendet: Montag, den 9. März 2009, 19:35:43 Uhr
> > Betreff: [Csnd] Re: lposcil and phase control
> >
> > Have you look at flooper2?
> >
> > Victor
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marco Stroppa"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:18 PM
> > Subject: [Csnd] lposcil and phase control
> >
> >
> > Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),
> >
> > I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with 
> > lposcil
> the
> > amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the second
> one!).
> > I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not work 
> > with
> > lposcil. Is
> > there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase 
> > (i.e. the
> > starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred table? 
> > loscil
> > doesn't have this
> > feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds of 
> > short
> > files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
> > Any help would be appreciated.
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > Marco
> >
> >
> >
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
> >
> >
> >
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"=
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
> csound"






Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
csound"=