Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[Csnd] lposcil and phase control

Date2009-03-09 17:18
FromMarco Stroppa
Subject[Csnd] lposcil and phase control
Attachmentslposcil.orc  lposcil.sco  
Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),

I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with lposcil the 
amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the second one!). 
I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not work with lposcil. Is 
there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase (i.e. the 
starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred table? loscil doesn't have this 
feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds of short 
files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.


Marco


      

Date2009-03-09 18:35
Fromvictor
Subject[Csnd] Re: lposcil and phase control
Have you look at flooper2?

Victor
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marco Stroppa" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:18 PM
Subject: [Csnd] lposcil and phase control


Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),

I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with lposcil 
the
amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the second 
one!).
I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not work with 
lposcil. Is
there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase (i.e. 
the
starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred table? loscil 
doesn't have this
feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds of short
files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.


Marco



Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe 
csound" 


Date2009-03-09 21:22
Fromjoachim heintz
Subject[Csnd] Re: lposcil and phase control
But -

poscil DOES use deferred tables, if I'm not wrong. I wrote an UDO  
(using poscil(3) for sample play) some months ago:
http://www.csounds.com/udo/displayOpcode.php?opcode_id=83
Perhaps you like to try if it's convenient for your needs.
Best -

	joachim



Am 09.03.2009 um 18:18 schrieb Marco Stroppa:

> Hello again (sorry for writing so many mails at the moment...:-),
>
> I would like to understand, why in the enclosed simple sampler with  
> lposcil the
> amplitude is so low (by me, 0.0 in the first note, and 5.9 in the  
> second one!).
> I have also the impression, that the control of the phase does not  
> work with lposcil. Is
> there a way (unless one uses diskin or poscil), to control the phase  
> (i.e. the
> starting point in the sound file) in a sampler with a deferred  
> table? loscil doesn't have this
> feature, diskin is all right, but heavy to use if one has hundreds  
> of short
> files, and poscil (or oscili, etc.) do no use deferred tables.
> Any help would be appreciated.
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Marco
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body  
> "unsubscribe csound"