[Csnd] [OT] Video
Date | 2010-06-14 18:01 |
From | John ff |
Subject | [Csnd] [OT] Video |
Looks like it is my Off-Topic day! I was asked today about software for video editing. Not creating the video (that exists) but modifying it, running colour filters varying over time, or brightness envelopes. Preferably Linux but I would consider others. Even better if scriptable. Bit like Csound for pictures.... Anyone got any suggestions? ==John ffitch Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-14 18:11 |
From | Peiman Khosravi |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: [OT] Video |
Never used it but I think it is capable of doing what you are after http://processing.org/ It also support OSC so it can communicate with csound. And of course on the pc and mac Max/msp/jitter does all of that. Doesn't PD have a video-based counterpart too? Best, P On 14 Jun 2010, at 18:01, John ff wrote: > Looks like it is my Off-Topic day! > > I was asked today about software for video editing. Not creating the > video (that exists) but modifying it, running colour filters varying > over time, or brightness envelopes. Preferably Linux but I would > consider others. Even better if scriptable. > > Bit like Csound for pictures.... > > Anyone got any suggestions? > ==John ffitch > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-14 18:12 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: [OT] Video |
Processing allows some manipulation and it's scripted. GEM or Gridflow which are available as external in Pd let you process video in lots of different ways. vvvv is another that I've played around with. Eyesweb provides tools for video processing but it's only on windows. AVSynthesis may also be worth a look. Rory. On 14 June 2010 18:01, John ff |
Date | 2010-06-14 18:38 |
From | Bernardo Barros |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: [OT] Video |
1. Processing 2. Blender 3. NodeBox, a kind of Python for 2D graphics 4. PD also has the GEM library. 5. There is an experimental SuperCollider server for graphics calles SCGraph Maybe there is much more options On 14 June 2010 14:01, John ff <jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk> wrote: Looks like it is my Off-Topic day! |
Date | 2010-06-14 19:18 |
From | Dave Phillips |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: [OT] Video |
John ff wrote: > I was asked today about software for video editing. Not creating the > video (that exists) but modifying it, running colour filters varying > over time, or brightness envelopes. Preferably Linux but I would > consider others. Even better if scriptable. > > Hi John, Some video editors for Linux: http://lives.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kdenlive.org/ http://www.openmovieeditor.org/ http://www.pitivi.org/ http://www.blender.org/ http://cinelerra.org/ http://www.kinodv.org/ http://fixounet.free.fr/avidemux/ I've used most of them. Btw, Blender is amazing, but it's considerably more than an editor. The other programs listed are more like typical non-linear video editors. I don't know if any support scripting. Some support JACK, btw. To the poster who mentioned AVSynthesis: It creates videos, it does not process existing footage. Would be nice if it did though. :) Best, dp Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-14 19:32 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: [OT] Video |
Blender certainly supports scripting, in Python. Regards, Mike On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Dave Phillips |
Date | 2010-06-14 19:57 |
From | Dave Phillips |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: [OT] Video |
Greetings, I forgot to list OpenShot: http://www.openshotvideo.com/ Btw, the LiVES editor is also controllable via OSC (and JACK). Best, dp Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-14 21:37 |
From | Mark Van Peteghem |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: [OT] Video |
Avidemux can also be scripted to do batch processing, but the documentation for that is not so good, although I got it working. It can apply colour filters, but not varying over time, so it won't help you. I use it a lot but only to convert video to a format that my portable video player can play. Dave Phillips wrote: > John ff wrote: >> I was asked today about software for video editing. Not creating the >> video (that exists) but modifying it, running colour filters varying >> over time, or brightness envelopes. Preferably Linux but I would >> consider others. Even better if scriptable. >> >> > Hi John, > > Some video editors for Linux: > > http://lives.sourceforge.net/ > > http://www.kdenlive.org/ > > http://www.openmovieeditor.org/ > > http://www.pitivi.org/ > > http://www.blender.org/ > > http://cinelerra.org/ > > http://www.kinodv.org/ > > http://fixounet.free.fr/avidemux/ > > > I've used most of them. Btw, Blender is amazing, but it's considerably > more than an editor. The other programs listed are more like typical > non-linear video editors. I don't know if any support scripting. Some > support JACK, btw. > > To the poster who mentioned AVSynthesis: It creates videos, it does > not process existing footage. Would be nice if it did though. :) > > Best, > > dp > > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" > > > |
Date | 2010-06-14 22:57 |
From | Chuckk Hubbard |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: [OT] Video |
If the tools mentioned don't offer enough control, there's always C. ;) -Chuckk On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:01 PM, John ff |
Date | 2010-06-15 01:22 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: [OT] Video |
If the other tools don't offer enough control and you happen to have nothing to do for next the next 5-10 years then I'd go along with Chuckk for sure! On 14 June 2010 22:57, Chuckk Hubbard |
Date | 2010-06-15 04:00 |
From | Greg Schroeder |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: [OT] Video |
"If the other tools don't offer enough control and you happen to have nothing to do for next the next 5-10 years then I'd go along with Chuckk for sure!" Did a csounder just criticize a learning curve vs. functionality issue in a programming language? Really? Greg On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Rory Walsh <rorywalsh@ear.ie> wrote: If the other tools don't offer enough control and you happen to have |
Date | 2010-06-15 06:22 |
From | Felipe Sateler |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] Video |
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 23:00, Greg Schroeder |
Date | 2010-06-15 06:59 |
From | Greg Schroeder |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] Video |
I was being flippant - I was responding to people who seemed to imply that a language (not Csound) was incredibly thorough, but had a steep learning curve. That's all. I don't feel like arguing, I just know that those first few months of 3 to 6 oscillator additive synthesis were infuriating for me, anyway. Greg On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com> wrote:
|
Date | 2010-06-15 08:01 |
From | Chuckk Hubbard |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] Video |
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Felipe Sateler |
Date | 2010-06-15 10:24 |
From | Rory Walsh |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] Video |
I wasn't necessarily talking about C, I was referring to the processing of video in general. We in the audio world only have to worry about 44100 samples a second for a mono source. It's my understanding that standard digital video has to deal with on average 800(Pixels)*600(Pixels)*3(RGB)*30(frames per second) 'samples' a second. This works out at over a million 'samples' a second. And that's using a rather low resolution. This is the only reason why I shudder at the thought of writing low level C code to process video. Rory. On 15 June 2010 06:59, Greg Schroeder |