[Csnd] Thanks for QuteCsound & the Current Csound Installer Bundle
Date | 2010-06-10 13:44 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Thanks for QuteCsound & the Current Csound Installer Bundle |
Friends, I want to both start and end this note by telling you all how grateful I am to be part of such an amazing, inspiring and dedicated community. And I want to thank you all for the incredibly work you do every day to make Csound better and better. Your questions, your suggestions, your instruments, your music, your front-ends, your new opcodes, even your criticisms - they are all an inspiration and they have all helped Csound to grow in amazing ways. At Barry Vercoe's retirement party last month, I started by thanking him, on behalf of the Csounders all over the world, for the great gift that he gave us all back in 1986; and then I showed them all Csound - "then and now" (starting with the very first Csound piece - which I wrote - "Trapped in Covert", and ended by playing Csound5 from a wiiMote and jamming over a remix of Vercoe's "synapse" that was being played and running Csound live from with Max4Live - yes Csound4Live! At MIT, they were blown away by the fact that we had come so far. They were blown away by all the "content" in QuteCsound. They were blown away by the fact that we could work "old-school", from the Terminal or with FLTK widgets or QT widgets or integrate directly into the latest production tool and performance tools such as Ableton Live or Max/MSP. (In fact Miller Puckette was there too, and he "got it") (Also, my 11 day old granddaughter Anaïs was there too - and she "got it" as I wandered around the hall improvising little sounds especially for her.) In addition to Barry Vercoe, over the years, we have been blessed by a great team of dedicated developers and maintainers, led by the amazing John ffitch, who have also given us so much of themselves to make this tool such a fantastically "useful" one. We always recognized how "powerful" it was, but for the past 20+ years, these dedicated developers have made it so much more "useful" and supported the work and styles of so many as they have continued to improve it while making sure that one could always work in the traditional way, if they preferred this. Especially for beginners, the current installer package is great: with QuteCsound, Csound5, and examples. Most importantly, all of these materials are supported and currently being developed, improved, and maintained, It contains everything one needs to get started.... with a lot of extra supporting materials, tutorials, and compositions to inspire. (both within QuteCsound and within the Examples Folder) And nothing extra to "confuse" (in my classes, there is much less - which do I use? where do I put this? is this Csound? how do I get it running?) At last, students and beginners don't need to search here and there on the net for all the other stuff that they might need to download to get going. (and they don't need to figure out where to put it and what to do with it - the examples, tutorials in QuteCsound, and the support videos... are WONDERFUL!) As one gets more expert with Csound, such as many of you on the list, one discovers all the other fantastic tools and support materials that they could use, and with experience, they will find the "best" fit for their style and needs: (Cecilia, Blue, MacCsound, WinXound, Ounk, CsoundAV, Emacs, Csound~, AlgoScore, Smuralot, Csound-x for Emacs) For the very first time in Csound's history, we have a package that is simple to install and use instantly, that is standard on all platforms, and that contains all the "essentials" which allow one to simply install "Csound5" and begin exploring and learning right "out of the box". The current "box" (package) is pretty great - and getting better all the time because of the constant improvements and refinements of the developers who are working on the releases. The generous and diligent work of those who are maintaining and supporting the current release is much appreciated. I hope that they can continue working together to bring the International Csound User Community such a fantastic "instrument" with which to discover their true musical selves. Dr. B. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-10 13:52 |
From | Dave Phillips |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Thanks for QuteCsound & the Current Csound Installer Bundle |
Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > ...the International Csound User Community... OT response to make my plea for a Csound conference, preferably held at Berklee under Dr B's direction (since he has lots of spare time, hehe). Wow, what a show that could be ! Best, dp Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-10 14:32 |
From | luis jure |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Thanks for QuteCsound & the Current Csound Installer Bundle |
on 2010-06-10 at 08:44 Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: >As one gets more expert with Csound, such as many of you on the list, >one discovers all the other fantastic tools and support materials >that they could use, and with experience, they will find the "best" >fit for their style and needs: >(Cecilia, Blue, MacCsound, WinXound, Ounk, CsoundAV, Emacs, Csound~, >AlgoScore, Smuralot, Csound-x for Emacs) and Vim... :-) Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-10 15:27 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Thanks for QuteCsound & the Current Csound Installer Bundle |
Dave, This is an excellent idea, and I will try to make something like this happen in 2011-2012 -dB On Jun 10, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Dave Phillips wrote: > Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > >> ...the International Csound User Community... > > OT response to make my plea for a Csound conference, preferably held > at Berklee under Dr B's direction (since he has lots of spare time, > hehe). > > Wow, what a show that could be ! > > Best, > > dp > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-10 15:29 |
From | Louis Cohen |
Subject | [Csnd] re: Thanks for QuteCsound & the Current Csound Installer Bundle |
Dr. B! You have surely said it all! As a composer I depend on Csound every day and could not express my gratitude better then you just did. Thanks to the entire csound community for keeping this valuable tool vibrant and always useful. best, Lou Cohen On Jun 10, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > Friends, > > I want to both start and end this note by telling you all how > grateful I am to be part of such an amazing, inspiring and dedicated > community.... Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-10 15:33 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Thanks for QuteCsound & the Current Csound Installer Bundle |
I second the call for a Csound conference, and I think a special effort should be made to include good music made with Csound, perhaps by including a juried music competition. Regards, Mike On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2010-06-10 16:14 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Thanks for QuteCsound & the Current Csound Installer Bundle |
That would be very nice. Victor On 10 Jun 2010, at 15:33, Michael Gogins wrote: > I second the call for a Csound conference, and I think a special > effort should be made to include good music made with Csound, perhaps > by including a juried music competition. > > Regards, > Mike > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Dr. Richard Boulanger > |
Date | 2010-06-10 17:06 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Csound Conference |
Dear Csounders, I will begin working on hosting a conference for here at Berklee in 2011/2012 - with concerts, papers, meetings, brainStorming sessions, and a visit/presentation from Barry Vercoe and Max Mathews too! (Max is spending a week with me later this month and so I will ask him about it.) -dB On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Victor Lazzarini wrote: > That would be very nice. > > Victor > On 10 Jun 2010, at 15:33, Michael Gogins wrote: > >> I second the call for a Csound conference, and I think a special >> effort should be made to include good music made with Csound, perhaps >> by including a juried music competition. >> >> Regards, >> Mike >> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Dr. Richard Boulanger >> |
Date | 2010-06-10 17:11 |
From | Steven Yi |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
Fantastic! I will be very much looking forward to this! Thanks! On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2010-06-10 17:32 |
From | andy fillebrown |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
Excellent! On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2010-06-10 18:06 |
From | Aidan Collins |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
That is very exciting! Any thoughts on themes for composition submissions? Aidan On 6/10/10, andy fillebrown |
Date | 2010-06-10 19:40 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
Not yet, but it would be cool to organize a series of concerts around different themes for sure. -dB On Jun 10, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Aidan Collins wrote: > That is very exciting! > Any thoughts on themes for composition submissions? > > Aidan > > On 6/10/10, andy fillebrown |
Date | 2010-06-10 19:44 |
From | john saylor |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
hey On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2010-06-10 19:59 |
From | Anthony Palomba |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Csound Conference |
It would be nice to be a part of the discussions on what the CSound road map looks like. Will the user community have any input on what CSound6 will look like? Anthony
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:44 PM, john saylor <js0000@gmail.com> wrote: hey |
Date | 2010-06-10 20:03 |
From | Oeyvind Brandtsegg |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
Great news. I'll want to be there. Oeyvind 2010/6/10 Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2010-06-10 21:10 |
From | Louis Cohen |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Csound Conference |
Csound conference is a fabulous idea. Concerts will be terrific....and don't forget realtime performances using csound! -Lou On Jun 10, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > Not yet, but it would be cool to organize a series of concerts > around different themes for sure. > > -dB > > On Jun 10, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Aidan Collins wrote: > >> That is very exciting! >> Any thoughts on themes for composition submissions? >> >> Aidan >> >> On 6/10/10, andy fillebrown |
Date | 2010-06-11 12:33 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
Dear Csounders, Once I get the ball rolling at Berklee, then I will ask all the Csounders for ideas about how to make the conference "work" for each of you. And I will want your help, so thanks already to those who have offered. I will be in touch as things come together for sure. We will need to plan the perfect "program" such as: - themes for the concerts - one or two "Csound Challenge" events/concerts (a call for the "focused" work for all of us - something like John ffitch's "Door" Project, or the SineWave Contest.) (or maybe even... the "trapped remixed" competition?) - the "perfect" balance of concerts, papers, demos, tutorials, workshops, and thinkTank/FutureDirections sessions - tutorial workshops and demos such as these come to mind: ++ Lettuce ++ CsoundAC ++ Blue ++ CsoundAPI ++ Csound & Python ++ Csound and VST ++ Csound and AU ++ Csound & Max4Live ++ Adding Opcodes to Csound5, ++ issues and solutions for using Csound in Live Performance ++ Performance Systems such as improSculpt & GranularImprovisor & ??? ++ AlgoComp in Csound ++ the new Cecilia ++ the older MacCsound ++ working with WinXound ++ working with csound~, ++ working with csound-x ++ working with QuteCsound ++ Csound and the OLPC I promise that it's going to be great for all of us, and I can't wait to start to make this happen especially because of how much I would learn at all these "sessions" and how much I would be inspired by all the "concerts" featuring your music. We might make a rule that you have to attend to be played on a concert, but open the call to feature "all" submissions of non-attending "delegates" on the webSite and on a Conference DVD that will include video of all sessions/demos and concerts. Just thinking out loud here.... Wishing you all the best, Dr. B. On Jun 10, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Louis Cohen wrote: > Csound conference is a fabulous idea. > > Concerts will be terrific....and don't forget realtime performances > using csound! > > -Lou > > > On Jun 10, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > >> Not yet, but it would be cool to organize a series of concerts >> around different themes for sure. >> >> -dB >> >> On Jun 10, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Aidan Collins wrote: >> >>> That is very exciting! >>> Any thoughts on themes for composition submissions? >>> >>> Aidan >>> >>> On 6/10/10, andy fillebrown |
Date | 2010-06-11 12:37 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Csound Conference |
Hello John, Thanks for offering to help... I will be in touch as we get closer and would appreciate your advice and support. Wishing you all the best, -dB On Jun 10, 2010, at 2:44 PM, john saylor wrote: > hey > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger > |
Date | 2010-06-11 13:31 |
From | Dave Phillips |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Csound Conference |
Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: > > > Once I get the ball rolling at Berklee, then I will ask all the > Csounders for ideas about how > to make the conference "work" for each of you. And I will want your > help, so thanks already > to those who have offered. I will be in touch as things come together > for sure. > Rick, you might want to get in touch with the current and/or past organizers of the Linux Audio conferences. IIRC they maintain a book that describes how they go about setting up the conference (it changes location & organizers each year), perhaps that could be helpful and save some time/agonies. > We might make a rule that you have to attend to be played on a > concert, but open the call > to feature "all" submissions of non-attending "delegates" on the > webSite and on a Conference > DVD that will include video of all sessions/demos and concerts. > Unfortunately that rule seems a bit "punitive", i.e. "If you can't make it to the show we won't play your piece". We'd likely lose the pleasure of some outstanding submissions from people who would love to attend yet not be able to make it. Just some thoughts, but 2011 will be here sooner than we think. Btw, 2012 won't do, the world is scheduled to end then. Of course if you know the exact date of termination we can always work around it. Hopefully helpful, dp :) Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-11 13:36 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Csound Conference |
Well, we have to do it in 2013 then, after the end of the world. Victor On 11 Jun 2010, at 13:31, Dave Phillips wrote: > Just some thoughts, but 2011 will be here sooner than we think. Btw, > 2012 won't do, the world is scheduled to end then. Of course if you > know the exact date of termination we can always work around it. Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-11 13:40 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
Dave, Thanks for the tips... and the links.... Nothing is carved in stone at all, but for years I attended the FEMF conference in Gainesville, run by Jim Sain and team. And this was his "rule" which was a great one. Everyone who was "played" on a concert, was there at the concert. It was great - and over the years we developed incredible relationships with each other. I stopped going to other conferences, because this one was so fulfilling... And... Jim Sain is both a great person and a fantastic composer himself. Hopefully it won't be that big a letDown to have had one's piece "featured" on the WebSite and the DVD if they can't make it to the conference in person. We could also have listening sessions, and the playing of all DVD compositions during receptions and coffee-sessions. And... Surely there would be exceptions, but I would want to present as much as we could and have the participants be there to share/discuss what was presented as it was and after it was presented - so there would be times after each concert to hang a bit. These are just initial thoughts... and they would and could change over time for sure. Wishing you all the best. -dB On Jun 11, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Dave Phillips wrote: > Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote: >> >> >> Once I get the ball rolling at Berklee, then I will ask all the >> Csounders for ideas about how >> to make the conference "work" for each of you. And I will want >> your help, so thanks already >> to those who have offered. I will be in touch as things come >> together for sure. >> > > Rick, you might want to get in touch with the current and/or past > organizers of the Linux Audio conferences. IIRC they maintain a book > that describes how they go about setting up the conference (it > changes location & organizers each year), perhaps that could be > helpful and save some time/agonies. > > >> We might make a rule that you have to attend to be played on a >> concert, but open the call >> to feature "all" submissions of non-attending "delegates" on the >> webSite and on a Conference >> DVD that will include video of all sessions/demos and concerts. >> > > Unfortunately that rule seems a bit "punitive", i.e. "If you can't > make it to the show we won't play your piece". We'd likely lose the > pleasure of some outstanding submissions from people who would love > to attend yet not be able to make it. > > Just some thoughts, but 2011 will be here sooner than we think. Btw, > 2012 won't do, the world is scheduled to end then. Of course if you > know the exact date of termination we can always work around it. > > Hopefully helpful, > > dp > > :) > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-11 13:49 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Csound Conference |
My suggestions for the Csound conference: All pieces that are submitted should be online on the Csound web site (or linked from it) for anyone who wants to hear them. Attendance should not be required for this to happen. There should be at least one formal, juried concert with blind judging by musicians or critics where the focus is primarily on musical quality. Attendance should not be required for this to happen, either. The reason we shouldn't care about requiring attendance for music is that we should care most of all about the quality of the music. There should be a few music prizes! I suggest a juried contest and a popularity contest in each category: fixed media, live electronics, computer and instrument(s). But not too many prizes or they become meaningless. I suggest "Vercoe Prize" for the juried contest. A CD or audio DVD should be prepared of all juried selections. It is sufficient, I think, for the recording to be a disk image or registered with an online music service, but if someone wants to go crazy we could burn discs, make inserts and covers, register with music distributors, etc. For papers and workshops, somebody has to attend in order to present the work. I think it is reasonable to request the author to attend, but not require it; a student or friend should also be acceptable. It should be a requirement that a PDF of the presentation be available for posting on the Csound web site (or linked from it). Finally, one of the most important features, it should be carefully planned out how the attendees and presenters can spend time eating and drinking together. See you there, Mike On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Victor Lazzarini |
Date | 2010-06-11 13:54 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Csound Conference |
Thanks, Some great suggestions here. Especially love the juried concert and prizes ideas. Adding them to the list. -dB On Jun 11, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Michael Gogins wrote: > My suggestions for the Csound conference: > > All pieces that are submitted should be online on the Csound web site > (or linked from it) for anyone who wants to hear them. Attendance > should not be required for this to happen. > > There should be at least one formal, juried concert with blind judging > by musicians or critics where the focus is primarily on musical > quality. Attendance should not be required for this to happen, either. > > The reason we shouldn't care about requiring attendance for music is > that we should care most of all about the quality of the music. > > There should be a few music prizes! I suggest a juried contest and a > popularity contest in each category: fixed media, live electronics, > computer and instrument(s). But not too many prizes or they become > meaningless. I suggest "Vercoe Prize" for the juried contest. > > A CD or audio DVD should be prepared of all juried selections. It is > sufficient, I think, for the recording to be a disk image or > registered with an online music service, but if someone wants to go > crazy we could burn discs, make inserts and covers, register with > music distributors, etc. > > For papers and workshops, somebody has to attend in order to present > the work. I think it is reasonable to request the author to attend, > but not require it; a student or friend should also be acceptable. It > should be a requirement that a PDF of the presentation be available > for posting on the Csound web site (or linked from it). > > Finally, one of the most important features, it should be carefully > planned out how the attendees and presenters can spend time eating and > drinking together. > > See you there, > Mike > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Victor Lazzarini > |
Date | 2010-06-11 14:00 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Csound Conference |
About the jury. I've been to several ICMCs over the years, including this year. Every year there are a few good pieces, some years a great piece, but there are way too many mediocre or downright bad pieces. And, it seems to me that the ICMA people have a narrow take on musical style for computer music (though this has been getting very gradually better over the years). So, I would suggest that the jury include people competent to judge a variety of styles including electroacoustic, generative, minimalist, modernist, and various styles falling under the umbrella 'electronica' including dub, ambient, etc. Without going crazy, of course. But pieces that have, or do not have, the following should receive unbiased and informed consideration: backbeat, tonality, identifiable sounds, samples, etc. Regards, Mike On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Dr. Richard Boulanger |
Date | 2010-06-11 14:27 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
Michael, Thanks for these points as well. And thanks for this reminder about how import it is to feature "all" the Csound music we are making. Rest assured, you don't have to worry about us being "inclusive" here at "Berklee". All genres and approaches will be represented and would be judged by "experts" in that genre. -dB On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Michael Gogins wrote: > About the jury. I've been to several ICMCs over the years, including > this year. Every year there are a few good pieces, some years a great > piece, but there are way too many mediocre or downright bad pieces. > And, it seems to me that the ICMA people have a narrow take on musical > style for computer music (though this has been getting very gradually > better over the years). So, I would suggest that the jury include > people competent to judge a variety of styles including > electroacoustic, generative, minimalist, modernist, and various styles > falling under the umbrella 'electronica' including dub, ambient, etc. > > Without going crazy, of course. But pieces that have, or do not have, > the following should receive unbiased and informed consideration: > backbeat, tonality, identifiable sounds, samples, etc. > > Regards, > Mike > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Dr. Richard Boulanger > |
Date | 2010-06-11 14:33 |
From | Peiman Khosravi |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Csound Conference |
My only question is what makes a csound composition a csound composition? Does it mean that the piece was entirely composed (and mixed) in csound? Does it mean that at least the sounds were created in csound alone with no other processing? Or does it mean that csound was used alongside other software? Or does it mean that it 'sounds' like a csound piece (if there is such a thing)? Most pieces which sound like a particular software tend to be (in my limited opinion) rather boring. I get people telling me that one of my pieces sounded like it was made with csound (in fact I never did an entire composition in csound, simply because I can't) and I do not take that as a compliment at all! One of the challenges for a composer is to make the software/hardware (including the speakers) as transparent as possible, or else intentionally reveal the tools for a compositional reason. I can propose the following for a competition: Given a set of pre-defined instruments (ranging from simple synthesis and processing units to more advanced DSP) composers must create a piece that utilises one or all of the given instruments to create an original sound-world. The piece can be made with csound alone and/or mixed in a DAW, but no other processing (perhaps with the exception of some EQing during the mixing stage). The instruments can be used by the composer in different formats, including LADSPA plug-ins, max patches, vst plug-ins/instruments or just plane CSD. One of the criteria for the jury can be how far have the composers got from the generic sound of the instruments... Just thinking out-loud. Best, Peiman On 11 Jun 2010, at 14:00, Michael Gogins wrote: > About the jury. I've been to several ICMCs over the years, including > this year. Every year there are a few good pieces, some years a great > piece, but there are way too many mediocre or downright bad pieces. > And, it seems to me that the ICMA people have a narrow take on musical > style for computer music (though this has been getting very gradually > better over the years). So, I would suggest that the jury include > people competent to judge a variety of styles including > electroacoustic, generative, minimalist, modernist, and various styles > falling under the umbrella 'electronica' including dub, ambient, etc. > > Without going crazy, of course. But pieces that have, or do not have, > the following should receive unbiased and informed consideration: > backbeat, tonality, identifiable sounds, samples, etc. > > Regards, > Mike > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Dr. Richard Boulanger > |
Date | 2010-06-11 14:41 |
From | Michael Gogins |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Csound Conference |
I think a piece is a Csound piece if, and only if, Csound was used to realize at least some vital parts of the piece. In other words, if you take out the Csound material, the piece doesn't work. That's it. It's OK if you COULD have used something else, like Max/MSP, to make those parts. The point is that Csound WAS used to make them. Regards, Mike On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Peiman Khosravi |
Date | 2010-06-11 14:51 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
More great ideas. Thanks so much for thinking out loud - and for your excellent Csound TOOLS! -dB On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Peiman Khosravi wrote: > My only question is what makes a csound composition a csound > composition? > > Does it mean that the piece was entirely composed (and mixed) in > csound? Does it mean that at least the sounds were created in csound > alone with no other processing? Or does it mean that csound was used > alongside other software? > > Or does it mean that it 'sounds' like a csound piece (if there is > such a thing)? Most pieces which sound like a particular software > tend to be (in my limited opinion) rather boring. I get people > telling me that one of my pieces sounded like it was made with > csound (in fact I never did an entire composition in csound, simply > because I can't) and I do not take that as a compliment at all! > > One of the challenges for a composer is to make the software/ > hardware (including the speakers) as transparent as possible, or > else intentionally reveal the tools for a compositional reason. > > I can propose the following for a competition: > > Given a set of pre-defined instruments (ranging from simple > synthesis and processing units to more advanced DSP) composers must > create a piece that utilises one or all of the given instruments to > create an original sound-world. The piece can be made with csound > alone and/or mixed in a DAW, but no other processing (perhaps with > the exception of some EQing during the mixing stage). The > instruments can be used by the composer in different formats, > including LADSPA plug-ins, max patches, vst plug-ins/instruments or > just plane CSD. One of the criteria for the jury can be how far have > the composers got from the generic sound of the instruments... > > Just thinking out-loud. > > Best, > > Peiman > > On 11 Jun 2010, at 14:00, Michael Gogins wrote: > >> About the jury. I've been to several ICMCs over the years, including >> this year. Every year there are a few good pieces, some years a great >> piece, but there are way too many mediocre or downright bad pieces. >> And, it seems to me that the ICMA people have a narrow take on >> musical >> style for computer music (though this has been getting very gradually >> better over the years). So, I would suggest that the jury include >> people competent to judge a variety of styles including >> electroacoustic, generative, minimalist, modernist, and various >> styles >> falling under the umbrella 'electronica' including dub, ambient, etc. >> >> Without going crazy, of course. But pieces that have, or do not have, >> the following should receive unbiased and informed consideration: >> backbeat, tonality, identifiable sounds, samples, etc. >> >> Regards, >> Mike >> >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Dr. Richard Boulanger >> |
Date | 2010-06-11 16:05 |
From | Stéphane Rollandin |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Csound Conference |
> I can propose the following for a competition: > > Given a set of pre-defined instruments (ranging from simple synthesis > and processing units to more advanced DSP) composers must create a > piece that utilises one or all of the given instruments to create an > original sound-world. The piece can be made with csound alone and/or > mixed in a DAW, but no other processing (perhaps with the exception of > some EQing during the mixing stage). The instruments can be used by > the composer in different formats, including LADSPA plug-ins, max > patches, vst plug-ins/instruments or just plane CSD. One of the > criteria for the jury can be how far have the composers got from the > generic sound of the instruments... + 1 Stef Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2010-06-11 18:37 |
From | "Dr. Richard Boulanger" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Csound Conference |
I agree, this is a great plan/strategy. -dB On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Stéphane Rollandin wrote: >> I can propose the following for a competition: >> >> Given a set of pre-defined instruments (ranging from simple synthesis >> and processing units to more advanced DSP) composers must create a >> piece that utilises one or all of the given instruments to create an >> original sound-world. The piece can be made with csound alone and/or >> mixed in a DAW, but no other processing (perhaps with the exception >> of >> some EQing during the mixing stage). The instruments can be used by >> the composer in different formats, including LADSPA plug-ins, max >> patches, vst plug-ins/instruments or just plane CSD. One of the >> criteria for the jury can be how far have the composers got from the >> generic sound of the instruments... > > + 1 > > Stef > > > > > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 > Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here > To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body > "unsubscribe csound" > Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |