[Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: creating a variable width pulse wave...
Date | 2009-11-10 02:34 |
From | "Partev Barr Sarkissian" |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: creating a variable width pulse wave... |
Another one is to apply a "morph" to the width parameters in your function table in your "score". Or set-up more than one pulse in your score function table and morph between them. That should leave you with some controllability. I morph amplitudes, frequencies and phase relations to minimize a mechnical aspects and get it to flow a bit more naturally. It doesn't sound so robotic and mechnised (well, unless I want it to). -Partev ======================================================================= --- jacobjoaquin@gmail.com wrote: From: Jacob Joaquin |
Date | 2009-11-10 02:51 |
From | Greg Schroeder |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: creating a variable width pulse wave... |
Yes, I understand the Shannon-Nyquist theorem, folks. That's why I don't just do it with a mess of line segment ftables. :-p To multisampling and/or dusting off my trig I go . . . Greg
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Partev Barr Sarkissian <encino_man@netscape.com> wrote: Another one is to apply a "morph" to the width parameters in your |
Date | 2009-11-10 08:16 |
From | Andres Cabrera |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: creating a variable width pulse wave... |
Hi, Victor hasn't chimed in, but he develop a methd of producing bandlimited pulses and other waveforms using FM. He wrote an article about this for AES, the Csound journal and others. Some more information: There's an example in QuteCsound showing the difference between band-limited and non-bandlimited oscillators (with and without interpolation). Cheers, Andrés On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Greg Schroeder |