[Csnd] pvscross/pvsmorph
| Date | 2012-11-14 10:18 |
| From | Oeyvind Brandtsegg |
| Subject | [Csnd] pvscross/pvsmorph |
| Hi Is it correct to assume that pvscross represents a subset of the features provided by pvsmorph? That is, setting the (pvsmorph) kfrqint parameter to zero, the kampint parameter will operate just like the (balance between) kamp1 and kamp2 paramters of pvscross, I think? So, effectively, is there any reason for using pvscross if we can do the same with pvsmorph? (no critizism implied, just trying to decide what opcode to use in an instrument) best Oeyvind -- Oeyvind Brandtsegg Professor of Music Technology NTNU 7491 Trondheim Norway Cell: +47 92 203 205 http://flyndresang.no/ http://www.partikkelaudio.com/ http://soundcloud.com/brandtsegg http://soundcloud.com/t-emp |
| Date | 2012-11-14 20:08 |
| From | peiman khosravi |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] pvscross/pvsmorph |
| Since you haven't had a reply yet I can speculate that it may be more efficient to use pvscross for amplitude interpolation alone. This is only a guess but I suspect the interpolation calculation is carried out for every bin even if the value is on zero, which would make pvsmorph a bit more CPU hungry. I could be really really wrong though
On 14 November 2012 10:18, Oeyvind Brandtsegg <oyvind.brandtsegg@ntnu.no> wrote: Hi |