[Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question
Date | 2013-08-16 12:22 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
Hello,
This is really not my area so this may be a stupid question. I'm wondering if there are known algorithms for modelling the behaviour of physical material. For instance, disturbances on the surface of water, or elasticity, or entropy. I'm sure there are but has any such thing found its way into csound or another music software?
For instance, I would like to set up some perpetual sonic activity that is deformed by an intervening force (coming from sensors), leaving some sort of decaying aftermath, like ripple on the water. Not sure if that conveys the message but at least I tried!
Thanks in advance
Peiman
|
Date | 2013-08-16 13:18 |
From | Bernt Isak Wærstad |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
Seems like the development has stopped, but there is the MSD externals for Max and PD which is a mass spring system for physical modeling. Tried it out when I was working with my master thesis, but never got around to use it for anything particularly useful: Also saw someone mentioning box2D, but I haven't tried it: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi@gmail.com> wrote:
Mvh. Bernt Isak Wærstad |
Date | 2013-08-16 14:24 |
From | Richard Power |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
Hello Peiman, You might be interested in Damian Keller's research: http://www.sfu.ca/sonic-studio/srs/EcoModelsComposition/Title.html His cd "touch'n'go" from earsay productions contains csound and cmask files that model natural processes, including running water and bouncing. On Aug 16, 2013, at 7:22 AM, peiman khosravi wrote:
|
Date | 2013-08-16 20:19 |
From | Oeyvind Brandtsegg |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
You could perhaps use scanned synthesis for something? It is essentially a large mass-spring system (correct me if I'm wrong). You can input energy to the system by using the hammer opcodes, audio input, or simply writing to the scanned table. Then read your values 'manually' from the scan table instead of using the scanning opcodes. Den 16. aug. 2013 14:22 skrev "peiman khosravi" <peimankhosravi@gmail.com> følgende:
|
Date | 2013-08-16 20:40 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
Hello,
Thanks for all the pointers everyone. I'm following up the links.
Oeyvind, that's interesting. I'll try it tonight. I'm getting the audio signal from the arm muscles with one of these, which could work well as an exciter.
Best
Peiman On 16 August 2013 20:19, Oeyvind Brandtsegg <oyvind.brandtsegg@ntnu.no> wrote:
|
Date | 2013-08-16 23:05 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
FYI I also found this: http://drpichon.free.fr/pmpd/ On 16 August 2013 20:40, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi@gmail.com> wrote:
|
Date | 2013-08-17 23:08 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
Here's a test video. It's PD for now but I need to get csoundapi~ working soon. Might take a few mins to load the movie, and no sound: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47945259/Screen%20Recording.mov
P On 16 August 2013 23:05, peiman khosravi <peimankhosravi@gmail.com> wrote:
|
Date | 2013-08-18 23:01 |
From | Oeyvind Brandtsegg |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
Looks promising! Great idea to connect the Xth sense to it. Perhaps this is also relevant: http://dafx12.york.ac.uk/papers/dafx12_submission_18.pdf I saw the presentation in York last year. You may already know of course(?) best Oeyvind 2013/8/18 peiman khosravi |
Date | 2013-08-18 23:35 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] OT: non-sounding physical modelling question |
Thanks Oeyvind, This paper looks really interesting. My bed time reading for tonight.
Best, Peiman
On 18 August 2013 23:01, Oeyvind Brandtsegg <oyvind.brandtsegg@ntnu.no> wrote: Looks promising! Great idea to connect the Xth sense to it. |