[Csnd] templates comments and csound journal question
Date | 2009-09-22 02:42 |
From | |
Subject | [Csnd] templates comments and csound journal question |
If you can find the last fnumber in a score and you can renumber the ftables why would a template be necessary?? You would just need to be able to renumber the output number regardless of what it is in your original file using just simple orc sco files. I am not against it I just don't understand it. the new inleta opcode looks like it might make it easier though I was intrested in publishing an article about my fnumber renumber program (and to add other fnumbers cases to it) but I am not sure how to contact the editors, I wasn't able and I could use some advice/testing of the program. http://www.csounds.com/node/435 Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you. |
Date | 2009-09-22 02:54 |
From | Steven Yi |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: templates comments and csound journal question |
Hi Eric, I received your email about 1 hour ago and have not had a chance to read through the article to reply (am sick today, will probably take a look at it tomorrow). Renumbering ftable numbers is tricky as it can be ambiguous (can be difficult to determine if an argument of '1' is ftable 1 or just the number value 1, especially with a UDO). Anyways, I recommend not using numbered ftables and just using ftgen opcodes so that a csound-generated number is used, thus sidestepping any issues of ftable number clashing (http://www.csounds.com/journal/2006winter/encapsulatedInstruments.html). I'll reply about your article when I have a chance to look through. Thanks, steven On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:42 PM, |
Date | 2009-09-25 21:48 |
From | edexter5 |
Subject | [Csnd] Re: templates comments and csound journal question |
Steven Yi wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > I received your email about 1 hour ago and have not had a chance to > read through the article to reply (am sick today, will probably take a > look at it tomorrow). Renumbering ftable numbers is tricky as it can > be ambiguous (can be difficult to determine if an argument of '1' is > ftable 1 or just the number value 1, especially with a UDO). Anyways, > I recommend not using numbered ftables and just using ftgen opcodes so > that a csound-generated number is used, thus sidestepping any issues > of ftable number clashing > (http://www.csounds.com/journal/2006winter/encapsulatedInstruments.html). > > I'll reply about your article when I have a chance to look through. > > Thanks, > steven > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:42 PM, |