Sorry, for the wrong subject line, here is that message with the right one...

Dear Peiman,

Michael is right in stating that spatialisation needs quite some effort, if you want to do it properly. Anyway: Steven mentioned our Paper at the LAC Conference 2009. He seems to be right in assuming, that this work of ours tackles a lot of subjects you want to deal with. I do not agree with you tjhough, that Ambisonic is  difficult to decode to different layouts of speakers. In fact I do regard it as very versatile especially in this point: As long as the set-up is symmetric, it takes only a minute do re-decode it to 4, 5, 6 or 8 speakers. If the set-up is not symmetric, Ambisonics might not be the right method, though.
So, if you do not mind the Ambisonic approach I could send you the .blue file off-list, if you like, as it employes Cmask and J-mask for spatial granular synthesis in cartesian as in polar coordinates and seems to adress all you want. Just disable the doppler-effect ;-)


All the best,

Jan Jacob



sound         |         movement          |          object         |          space
sonic architecture       |        site: http://www.sonicarchitecture.de
spatial electronic composition     |    2nd order ambisonic music

Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
          https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"

you surely mean 'ambisonioc' rather than 'ambiosonic', do you not?

On 15 Nov 2010, at 12:44, peiman khosravi wrote:

Dear Jan,

Thanks very much for your email. I am certainly open to getting my head around Ambiosonic. I would love to have a look at your code and listen to the result. My only problem is that blue 2 refuses to run on my computer but I can sort that out with Steven I am sure. Please do send me your documents :-)

Thanks again.

Peiman

On 15 November 2010 00:08, Jan Jacob Hofmann <jjh@sonicarchitecture.de> wrote:

Sorry, for the wrong subject line, here is that message with the right one...

Dear Peiman,

Michael is right in stating that spatialisation needs quite some effort, if you want to do it properly. Anyway: Steven mentioned our Paper at the LAC Conference 2009. He seems to be right in assuming, that this work of ours tackles a lot of subjects you want to deal with. I do not agree with you tjhough, that Ambisonic is  difficult to decode to different layouts of speakers. In fact I do regard it as very versatile especially in this point: As long as the set-up is symmetric, it takes only a minute do re-decode it to 4, 5, 6 or 8 speakers. If the set-up is not symmetric, Ambisonics might not be the right method, though.
So, if you do not mind the Ambisonic approach I could send you the .blue file off-list, if you like, as it employes Cmask and J-mask for spatial granular synthesis in cartesian as in polar coordinates and seems to adress all you want. Just disable the doppler-effect ;-)


All the best,

Jan Jacob



sound         |         movement          |          object         |          space
sonic architecture       |        site: http://www.sonicarchitecture.de
spatial electronic composition     |    2nd order ambisonic music

Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
          https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"

yes yes!! I keep mistyping this word every time!!! 

Well, actually I mean 'ambisonic' :-)

On 15 November 2010 12:50, Victor Lazzarini <Victor.Lazzarini@nuim.ie> wrote:

you surely mean 'ambisonioc' rather than 'ambiosonic', do you not?

On 15 Nov 2010, at 12:44, peiman khosravi wrote:

Dear Jan,

Thanks very much for your email. I am certainly open to getting my head around Ambiosonic. I would love to have a look at your code and listen to the result. My only problem is that blue 2 refuses to run on my computer but I can sort that out with Steven I am sure. Please do send me your documents :-)

Thanks again.

Peiman

On 15 November 2010 00:08, Jan Jacob Hofmann <jjh@sonicarchitecture.de> wrote:

Sorry, for the wrong subject line, here is that message with the right one...

Dear Peiman,

Michael is right in stating that spatialisation needs quite some effort, if you want to do it properly. Anyway: Steven mentioned our Paper at the LAC Conference 2009. He seems to be right in assuming, that this work of ours tackles a lot of subjects you want to deal with. I do not agree with you tjhough, that Ambisonic is  difficult to decode to different layouts of speakers. In fact I do regard it as very versatile especially in this point: As long as the set-up is symmetric, it takes only a minute do re-decode it to 4, 5, 6 or 8 speakers. If the set-up is not symmetric, Ambisonics might not be the right method, though.
So, if you do not mind the Ambisonic approach I could send you the .blue file off-list, if you like, as it employes Cmask and J-mask for spatial granular synthesis in cartesian as in polar coordinates and seems to adress all you want. Just disable the doppler-effect ;-)


All the best,

Jan Jacob



sound         |         movement          |          object         |          space
sonic architecture       |        site: http://www.sonicarchitecture.de
spatial electronic composition     |    2nd order ambisonic music

Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
          https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"