Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin
Date | 2012-01-16 03:17 |
From | "Partev Barr Sarkissian" |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin |
Probably the result of one kind of string rubbing against another kind of string, vibrations transferring into a resonating cavity, then out through the sound-box. There are some waveguide (modeling) opcodes to cover strings--- "streson"- a string resonator "wgbow"- bowed string tone waveguide I've only briefly explored these, might be a good start. After that, I guess it's just finding the right filter responses to dial in the spectral aspects. -Partev ============================================================= --- dennis.raddle@gmail.com wrote: From: Dennis Raddle |
Date | 2012-01-16 11:53 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin |
I would have thought this is related to the string's increasing stiffness near the bridge, although I am just guessing. Note that the closer you move towards the bridge the more inharmonic the sound becomes. Warning: rant follows! It's interesting that inharmonicity is just as much involved in all musical sounds as harmonicity (musical sounds but not so much musical structures). Take the transient portion for instance. Students are still baffled when I play them a vibraphone without the attack, is it a flute? Bowed cymbal? French Horn!? I would suggest that reducing a complex musical sound to a temporally invariant and purely harmonic model is a near-criminal activity :-) Best, Peiman On 16 January 2012 03:17, Partev Barr Sarkissian <encino_man@netscape.com> wrote: Probably the result of one kind of string rubbing against another |
Date | 2012-01-16 11:56 |
From | Erik de Castro Lopo |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin |
peiman khosravi wrote: > It's interesting that inharmonicity is just as much involved in all musical > sounds as harmonicity (musical sounds but not so much musical structures). > Take the transient portion for instance. Students are still baffled when I > play them a vibraphone without the attack, is it a flute? Bowed cymbal? > French Horn!? > > I would suggest that reducing a complex musical sound to a temporally > invariant and purely harmonic model is a near-criminal activity :-) LA Synthesis anyone? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Arithmetic_synthesis Erik |
Date | 2012-01-16 12:06 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin |
It's a 19-C Helmholtzian model of sound, which somehow people still believe in. It's as if, when preparing for a space flight towards Mars, you just took into account Newton's physics and nothing else. On 16 Jan 2012, at 11:53, peiman khosravi wrote: > I would suggest that reducing a complex musical sound to a temporally invariant and purely harmonic model is a near-criminal activity :-) Dr Victor Lazzarini Senior Lecturer Dept. of Music NUI Maynooth Ireland tel.: +353 1 708 3545 Victor dot Lazzarini AT nuim dot ie Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599 Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound" |
Date | 2012-01-16 12:16 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin |
On 16 January 2012 12:06, Victor Lazzarini <Victor.Lazzarini@nuim.ie> wrote: It's a 19-C Helmholtzian model of sound, which somehow people still believe in. It's as if, when preparing for a space flight towards Mars, you just took into account Newton's physics and nothing else. Indeed
|
Date | 2012-01-16 15:23 |
From | Joerg Spix |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin |
Am 16.01.12 12:53, schrieb peiman khosravi: > I would have thought this is related to the string's increasing > stiffness near the bridge, although I am just guessing. Note that the > closer you move towards the bridge the more inharmonic the sound becomes. I think it is the clamping by the saddle and some clamping by the bridge (which moves so not as much clamping as at the saddle) and the stiffness of the string which produces a small innharmonicity in the strings partials. > I would suggest that reducing a complex musical sound to a temporally > invariant and purely harmonic model is a near-criminal activity :-) I agree! > On 16 January 2012 03:17, Partev Barr Sarkissian > |
Date | 2012-01-16 17:23 |
From | Stefan Thomas |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin |
You should not forget, that a partial isn't static at all. It changes slightly it's pitch and I think, the higher the partial is, the more it changes it's frequency. Adding some random change of pitch could be a solution, I think. 2012/1/16 Joerg Spix <Joerg.Spix@spix.homeip.net> Am 16.01.12 12:53, schrieb peiman khosravi: |
Date | 2012-01-16 19:02 |
From | mark jamerson |
Subject | Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin |
There is also the factor that the inharmonicity of each string is different. If you are actually modeling all four strings of the violin in your model, you should theoretically choose upon which string each note is being played, and then adjust the inharmonicity of the upper partials based upon that string. As we all know, A5 sounds differently if played at the 12th position on the A string versus played at the 5th position on the E string. From: Stefan Thomas <kontrapunktstefan@googlemail.com> To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [Csnd] the "shimmer/sheen" of a violin You should not forget, that a partial isn't static at all. It changes slightly it's pitch and I think, the higher the partial is, the more it changes it's frequency. Adding some random change of pitch could be a solution, I think. 2012/1/16 Joerg Spix <Joerg.Spix@spix.homeip.net> Am 16.01.12 12:53, schrieb peiman khosravi: |