Nice, i like it.
as a classical guitar player (i.e. tuned :) ) it takes me some mental
effort.

Thanks.
ciao,
francesco.




--
View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Newish-piece-tp5732689p5732691.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Thanks for the piece, I do like the way the tuning creates extra ebba
and flow. I'm somewhat unfamiliar with listening to alternate tunings
but found in this one an image of curved space somehow. Thanks.
Oeyvind

2014-02-20 9:43 GMT+01:00 francesco :
> Nice, i like it.
> as a classical guitar player (i.e. tuned :) ) it takes me some mental
> effort.
>
> Thanks.
> ciao,
> francesco.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Newish-piece-tp5732689p5732691.html
> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug trackers
> csound6:
>             https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/tickets/
> csound5:
>             https://sourceforge.net/p/csound/bugs/
> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
>
>



-- 

Oeyvind Brandtsegg
Professor of Music Technology
NTNU
7491 Trondheim
Norway
Cell: +47 92 203 205

http://flyndresang.no/
http://www.partikkelaudio.com/
http://soundcloud.com/brandtsegg
http://soundcloud.com/t-emp

Thanks for the comments Outbound and Francesco! Glad you enjoyed it.

Good stuff, I really like this music.

The detune sounds nice. If this reminded me of something, it would be
Ferrucio Busoni's Fantasia but it sounds original. Did you use python for
csound?



--
View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Newish-piece-tp5732689p5732718.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Very nice work! I like the 5 against 4 rhythms -- they fit the mood created
by the shifting harmonies. I also appreciate the fact that this is real
music, which is not something one can always say about microtonal
explorations. It has, you know, a perceptible structure. The opening theme
recurs. (Shockingly retro, I know.)

Why 46? I like the sound of the triads and the occasional 7/4 interval, but
what led you to choose it? Mostly I haven't gone beyond 31 (though I've
poked at 53 a few times). Too many notes, and of course you can't get to
most of them from the keyboard.



--
View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Newish-piece-tp5732689p5732727.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Thanks again for the additional comments...

Thorin, it *is* hand written...no algorithms! Perhaps I should have been
more clear: it's hand written as a score in the microcsound format, which
(as a script) turns it into a Csound score.

Jim asked why I chose 46-edo. 46 is one of those edos that has a lot of
theoretical possibilities, but very little music has been written in it. I
don't blame you for having not tried it! I've done work in as high as
171-edo, but the purity vs. difficulty thing starts showing diminishing
returns. I've given myself the new boundary of not ever wanting/needing to
go beyond 53 (or 41 should be good enough for most purposes).

But, I guess you could say, I wanted to fill that gap in the 'repertoire'...
:)

Cheers,
AKJ




--
View this message in context: http://csound.1045644.n5.nabble.com/Newish-piece-tp5732689p5732746.html
Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.