| No, because you are not running in realtime. You are running as fast the computer can run. You need to add a -odac to slow it down to realtime.
Prof. Victor Lazzarini
Maynooth University
Ireland
> On 20 Mar 2024, at 21:33, Risto Kuusisto wrote:
>
> I added "massign 0,0". There was no difference compared to the earlier behaviour. All the events were read and printed correctly
> but without any time-delays between events.
> If i have a real midi-connection and events come after every 2s, then printing happens also at 2s interval.
> Now when the midi-file includes exactly the same events with the same 2s time-intervals, shouldn't printing then also happen after every 2s ?
>
> So actually it's the question of how csd get's the midi-events in. The manual says that -F behaves the same way as the real-connections.
> However the manual doesn't say exactly what happens to the event time-stamps in the midi-file. So if the -F is identical to the real midi-input, it would mean
> also that timing of the events will happen before they reach the active code.
>
> Is there still something else that is needed to preserve the time-stamps from the midi-file ?
> By the way i also tried the "opposite", "massign 1,1". Also that didn't help.
>
> Csound mailing list
> Csound@listserv.heanet.ie
> https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND
> Send bugs reports to
> https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
> Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
Csound mailing list
Csound@listserv.heanet.ie
https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND
Send bugs reports to
https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
|