Re: [Csnd] Interesting results rendering wgpluck2 at sr 96000 vs 44100
| Date | 2022-11-05 05:49 |
| From | Scott Daughtrey |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] Interesting results rendering wgpluck2 at sr 96000 vs 44100 |
Hah, cool, glad you're experimenting with that. Now I have to try those out as well!
As I mentioned before, in many cases the different sr seems to have no effect but in a few I've tried it does, guess it depends on the individual opcodes etc.
Scott
Csound mailing list
Csound@listserv.heanet.ie
https://listserv.heanet.ie/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CSOUND
Send bugs reports to
https://github.com/csound/csound/issues
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here |
| Date | 2023-04-02 23:53 |
| From | Partev Sarkissian <0000060b2ef1338e-dmarc-request@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE> |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd] Interesting results rendering wgpluck2 at sr 96000 vs 44100 |
|
Is there zero padding but in to any sample rate changes when going from one to the other,
once something is rendered? Curious,... March JAES paper on the subject of sample rate
change, so I was wondering.
-Partev
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Daughtrey <stunes6556@GMAIL.COM> To: CSOUND@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE Sent: Sat, Nov 5, 2022 5:49 am Subject: Re: [Csnd] Interesting results rendering wgpluck2 at sr 96000 vs 44100 Hah, cool, glad you're experimenting with that. Now I have to try those out as well!
As I mentioned before, in many cases the different sr seems to have no effect but in a few I've tried it does, guess it depends on the individual opcodes etc.
Scott
Csound mailing list
Send bugs reports to
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
|