http://mitpress.mit.edu/e-books/csound/frontpage.html   Received: from shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa08028; 3 Dec 98 19:40 GMT Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk) by shaun.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2) for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk id 0zlebp-0002BS-00; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 19:40:17 +0000 Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (TAA10612); Thu, 3 Dec 1998 19:37:05 GMT Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 19:36:52 GMT Received: from mserv1a.u-net.net [195.102.240.34] by hermes via SMTP (TAA10436); Thu, 3 Dec 1998 19:36:50 GMT Received: from p75.nas1.is3.u-net.net (babcom.u-net.com) [195.102.196.75] by mserv1a.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #2) id 0zleYe-0005J7-00; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 19:37:00 +0000 Message-ID: <3665A468.CDEE81B7@babcom.u-net.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 20:34:48 +0000 From: Steven Cook Reply-To: steve@babcom.u-net.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 (Macintosh; I; 68K) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Csound List Subject: Csound_68k Latest Version? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Hi, I seem to remember reading recently about a problem with the rand opcode which was subsequently fixed. Which Mac 68k version is OK to use and where should I download it from? The version at: ftp://ftp.maths.bath.ac.uk/pub/dream/platforms/mac Seems to be faulty. Thanks.   Received: from wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk by omphalos.maths.Bath.AC.UK id aa08314; 3 Dec 98 22:06 GMT Received: from [144.173.6.14] (helo=exeter.ac.uk) by wallace.maths.bath.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #2) for jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk id 0zlgti-0002ju-00; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:06:54 +0000 Received: from noether [144.173.8.10] by hermes via SMTP (WAA01108); Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:03:48 GMT Received: from exeter.ac.uk by maths.ex.ac.uk; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:03:35 GMT Received: from root@ax-nicb.axnet.it [194.184.60.149] by hermes via ESMTP (WAA01073); Thu, 3 Dec 1998 22:03:29 GMT Received: (from nicb@localhost) by ax-nicb.axnet.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA23629; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 21:54:48 +0100 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 21:54:44 +0100 (ROM ) From: Nicola Bernardini To: Csound mailing list Subject: Re: Dynamic Controls in last releases (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-csound-outgoing@maths.ex.ac.uk Precedence: bulk This posting did'nt make it to the list, as far as I can tell. Trying again... nicb ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 19:18:26 +0100 (ROM ) From: Nicola Bernardini To: Csound mailing list Subject: Re: Dynamic Controls in last releases On Tue, 1 Dec 1998 jpff@maths.bath.ac.uk wrote: [snip] > The dynamic controls are an as yet unfinished set of on-screen sliders > which are not in any way related to MIDI. The opcode control causes > the display of a slider panel, and it can read or set the sliders as > it synthesises. It is not documented as I am not totally happy with > it. It seems to work except sometimes panels disappear unexpectedly. > I need to work over it a bit, as well as consider how to do the same > for Unix/X I was thinking about doing slider controls for csound under linux for a while: glad I don't have to. My idea was to communicate to the graphic process that runs the actual sliders through IPC streams - which is probably good only on unix systems (and SYSV at that); but this way, the communication is one-to-one, no client-server, and fast. Furthermore, quite a lot of 'small languages' support IPC, so that a graphic interface could be easily built in tcl/tk or in perl/gtk or both (not for the faint-hearted, though). At any rate, IMHO the details of communication should be hidden from the upper protocol layer, so these things would be easy to port across platforms and interfaces. In my very very limited time, I'm ready to help if needed. Nicola ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nicola Bernardini E-mail: nicb@axnet.it Re graphics: A picture is worth 10K words -- but only those to describe the picture. Hardly any sets of 10K words can be adequately described with pictures.