I have experienced this too.  One time I was working at 48000 (Audigy + ASIO
on my desktop) and then I broke my foot, after which I used my laptop
exclusively, which has no preference for 48000.  I attempted to just change
everything to 44100, and it sounded distinctly different.  I don't recall
what I ended up doing, and my work files for that piece were one of the
casualties of the Great Linux Csound Installing Hard Drive Massacre of
2007.  I salvaged the finished mp3, but the work files are gone.

-Chuckk

On 10/21/07, ad80a <ad80a@libero.it> wrote:
>
>
> I don't understand why changing control rate and sampling rate I've
> differences in timbre and amplitude values.
> I'm working with an instrument that has white noise filtered by a bank of
> resonant filters and a waveguide reverb with a lot of delay lines (with
> delay opcode because I don't need to change the delay at kr).
> Using kr 441 sr 44100 I obtain a sound I like (this is the strangest
> thing!), but with kr equal to sr (44100/44100), I have some resonance
> peaks,
> a slightly different timbre, and greater amplitude values...I don't
> understand why! I DON'T use modulating delay lines! And I don't use any
> krate variables! Why changing kr influences timbre and amplitude? Same
> thing
> if i try with sr 96000, timbre changes (and it's natural because there are
> more high frequencies and a cleaner timbre), but amplitudes are about
> TWICE
> great!
> Thanks for your help and sorry for this newbie question.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Sr%2C-kr-and-amplitude-tf4664296.html#a13324298
> Sent from the Csound - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
>



-- 
http://www.badmuthahubbard.com